Pedestrian Face Detection for Autonomous Vehicle Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in predicting pedestrian intentions and coordinating with them effectively, particularly when pedestrians are not detected by cameras, leading to potential unsafe interactions.

Innovation Solution

A controller system in autonomous vehicles is programmed to detect the presence of pedestrians, determine if their faces are visible, and adjust actions such as lane changes and braking based on this information to ensure safer navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle uses basic pedestrian detection without face recognition, then the detection speed is faster and system complexity is lower, but the ability to predict pedestrian intentions and ensure safety is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in pedestrian interactionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple stages: first detecting if a pedestrian is present in the lane change path, then separately analyzing whether facial features are visible. This segmentation allows the system to apply complex face recognition only when necessary (when a pedestrian is detected), rather than processing all images through the full analysis pipeline, thus improving safety while managing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary pedestrian detection before applying the more computationally intensive face recognition algorithm. By first identifying potential hazards (pedestrians in the path), the system can then focus resources on analyzing only those cases where face visibility might provide additional safety information, rather than processing all detected objects with full face recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the vehicle implements face detection to predict pedestrian intentions, then the safety and coordination with pedestrians is improved, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction of pedestrian intentionsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis is divided into distinct phases: pedestrian detection phase followed by face recognition phase. This allows the system to quickly rule out safe situations (no pedestrian detected) without undergoing the time-consuming face analysis, while still performing comprehensive safety checks when pedestrians are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs face detection selectively rather than universally - only when a pedestrian is detected in the lane change path. This partial application of the more time-consuming algorithm reduces overall processing time while maintaining safety for the critical cases where pedestrian intention prediction is most valuable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the vehicle takes conservative actions (slowing down, changing lanes) whenever pedestrians are detected, then safety is improved, but the productivity and efficiency of the vehicle decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during lane changesVSAvoidvehicle efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of caution based on local conditions - specifically whether the pedestrian's face is visible. When facial features are detected, indicating the pedestrian likely sees the vehicle, the system can proceed with standard caution. When faces are not visible, suggesting the pedestrian may not be aware of the vehicle, the system applies enhanced caution (slowing down, avoiding lane changes). This localized adjustment of safety measures optimizes both safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle's response to detected pedestrians is dynamic rather than static - it adjusts its behavior based on real-time analysis of face visibility. The system can transition between different operational modes (cautious avoidance vs. normal operation) depending on the assessed risk level, allowing efficient operation in safe conditions while maintaining high safety standards when risks are identified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10082796B2Pedestrian face detection
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10082796B2 patent drawing
  • US10082796B2 patent drawing
  • US10082796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for a vehicle is programmed to detect a pedestrian in an image received from a camera, determine whether a face of the pedestrian is present in the image, and cause the vehicle to change lanes based on the absence of the face.