Pedestrian Impact Sensing Using Acceleration Envelopes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pedestrian protection systems in vehicles face challenges in accurately distinguishing between pedestrian and non-pedestrian impacts, leading to potential inappropriate deployment of countermeasures.

Innovation Solution

A detection system utilizing sensors mounted on the vehicle's bumper to calculate an acceleration envelope and count zero crossings in impact signals, employing a discrimination hyperplane to differentiate between pedestrian and non-pedestrian impacts, thereby triggering appropriate countermeasures such as deploying a pop-up hood or external airbags.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pedestrian protection systems deploy countermeasures based on impact detection, then pedestrian injury risk is reduced, but false deployment occurs when non-pedestrian objects are misidentified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedestrian protection accuracyVSAvoidfalse deployment of countermeasures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The impact detection function is divided into multiple independent analysis components: acceleration envelope calculation, zero-crossing count analysis, and discrimination hyperplane evaluation. Each component processes specific features of the impact signal separately, allowing the system to comprehensively evaluate impact characteristics and reduce misidentification of non-pedestrian objects as pedestrians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If sensors are mounted on the bumper to detect impacts, then impact detection capability is improved, but the system cannot distinguish between pedestrian and non-pedestrian impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact detection capabilityVSAvoidimpact type discrimination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from one-dimensional impact detection (simple presence/absence) to multi-dimensional analysis by calculating acceleration envelopes and zero-crossing counts. This creates a two-dimensional feature space that enables the discrimination hyperplane to accurately separate pedestrian impacts from non-pedestrian impacts, solving the precision problem while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively reduces the risk of pedestrian injury by accurately identifying impacts and deploying countermeasures only when a pedestrian is involved, minimizing unnecessary activations and ensuring timely protection.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor may be mounted to the bumper and output an impact signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS9616836B2Two dimensional pedestrian impact sensing
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9616836B2 patent drawing
  • US9616836B2 patent drawing
  • US9616836B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle system includes a sensor that outputs an impact signal and a processing device that is programmed to calculate an acceleration envelope from the impact signal, determine a number of times the impact signal crosses a predetermined threshold, and determine whether the impact signal represents a pedestrian impact. Whether the impact is a pedestrian impact is based at least in part on the acceleration envelope and the number of times the impact signal crosses the predetermined threshold.