Pedicle Screw Planning With AR Guidance and Implant Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pedicle screw placement in spinal surgeries relies heavily on surgeon experience and pre-operative imaging, with limited assistance from assistive fluoroscopy and navigation, leading to inefficiencies and risks due to radiation exposure and high costs.

Innovation Solution

A surgical assistance system utilizing machine learning models and virtual reality/augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement by analyzing patient images and providing optimal implant configurations, reducing reliance on manual techniques and improving precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If free-hand technique is used for pedicle screw placement, then surgeon experience and knowledge are utilized, but precision and reliability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepedicle screw placement precisionVSAvoidsurgical outcome reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pre-operative planning and creates a virtual surgical model before the actual surgery. This preliminary action allows the surgical path to be determined and visualized in advance, improving precision without requiring complex intra-operative interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the patient's anatomy from pre-operative images and uses this digital twin for planning and guidance. This copying approach allows precise measurement and path determination without repeatedly exposing the patient to radiation during surgery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If assistive fluoroscopy is used to guide pedicle screw placement, then real-time guidance is provided, but radiation exposure and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time screw placement guidanceVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical path and target locations are determined before surgery using pre-operative imaging and virtual modeling. This preliminary determination eliminates the need for continuous fluoroscopy during surgery, reducing radiation exposure while maintaining guidance accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical fluoroscopy guidance system with a computer-based virtual reality and image processing system. This substitution provides the necessary guidance information without the harmful radiation effects of fluoroscopy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If navigation systems are used for pedicle screw placement, then guidance accuracy is improved, but time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescrew placement guidance accuracyVSAvoidsurgery duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

All planning and path determination is completed before surgery in the virtual surgical model. During the actual surgery, the pre-determined paths are simply followed, significantly reducing the time required compared to intra-operative navigation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual surgical model serves as a pre-computed guide that can be quickly referenced during surgery. This digital copy contains all necessary measurement and path information, eliminating the need for time-consuming intra-operative navigation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If conventional screw selection methods are used, then implant selection is based on surgeon experience, but incorrect selections and operational risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant selection accuracyVSAvoidoperational risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the virtual surgical model to accurately measure and determine the appropriate screw size and type for each patient's unique anatomy. This digital measurement approach eliminates guesswork and ensures correct implant selection based on precise virtual measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by comparing the planned virtual screw placement with the actual anatomical structures in the virtual model. This feedback mechanism ensures that the selected implants are appropriate for the patient's specific anatomy and surgical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260013948A1Systems and methods for assisting and augmenting surgical procedures
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 CARLSMED INC
  • US20260013948A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013948A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing assistance to a surgeon during an implant surgery are disclosed. A method includes defining areas of interest in diagnostic data of a patient and defining a screw bone type based on the surgeon's input. Post defining the areas of interest, salient points are determined for the areas of interest. Successively, an XZ angle, an XY angle, and a position entry point for a screw are determined based on the salient points of the areas of interest. Successively, a maximum screw diameter and a length of the screw are determined based on the salient points. Thereafter, the screw is identified and suggested to the surgeon for usage during the implant surgery.