Pedicle Screw Locking System for Spinal Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal fixation procedures face challenges in minimizing invasiveness and reducing recovery time for patients with spinal disorders, particularly in stabilizing the spine and maintaining interbody implants, due to the complexity of the spinal structure and the need for precise manipulation of vertebrae during corrective surgeries.

Innovation Solution

A pedicle screw locking system comprising a reduction tube with an inner shaft, grips, a reduction sleeve, and a rotatable tube, along with a locking driver, allows for precise repositioning and locking of pedicle screws, enabling the secure insertion and locking of spinal rods while minimizing invasive procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spinal fixation procedures are used, then spinal stabilization can be achieved, but the invasiveness increases and recovery time extends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilizationVSAvoidinvasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reduction tube is nested within the distractor body, and the distractor is nested within the rod insertion device. This nested configuration allows multiple functions (reduction, distraction, rod insertion) to be integrated in a single minimally invasive device, eliminating the need for separate invasive procedures while achieving reliable spinal stabilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The distractor device serves multiple functions: it acts as a reduction tube for vertebral alignment, a distraction device for space creation, and a guide for rod insertion. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate invasive procedures needed, thereby reducing overall invasiveness while maintaining spinal stabilization reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex spinal manipulation procedures are performed, then precise vertebrae repositioning can be achieved, but procedural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebrae repositioning precisionVSAvoidprocedural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reduction tube and distractor functions are merged into a single integrated device. The reduction tube with its engagement fingers combines vertebral alignment capability with the distraction function, simplifying the procedural steps while maintaining precise vertebrae repositioning through the unified device architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement fingers act as intermediaries between the reduction tube and the vertebrae, providing precise control and feedback during manipulation. This intermediary mechanism enables accurate vertebrae repositioning while simplifying the operator's control, reducing procedural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate devices are used for spinal fixation, then various functions can be performed, but the number of procedures and recovery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The distractor device provides universal functionality by integrating reduction tube capabilities, distraction mechanisms, and rod insertion guidance into one device. This eliminates the need for multiple separate procedures, reducing overall surgical time and patient recovery time while maintaining full functional versatility for spinal fixation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple spinal fixation functions (reduction, distraction, rod insertion) are merged into a single procedural sequence using the integrated distractor device. This combined approach reduces the cumulative time of multiple separate procedures and accelerates patient recovery while preserving all necessary functional capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2878276B1System for corrective spinal surgery
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 K2M INC
  • EP2878276B1 patent drawingFigure 1~1A
  • EP2878276B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2878276B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A pedicle screw locking system includes a reduction tube and a locking driver. The reduction tube includes an inner shaft, a pair of grips, a reduction sleeve, and a rotatable tube. The inner shaft has a threaded end and reduction arms distally extending from the threaded end. Each grip of the pair of grips has a finger configured to engage the receiver of a pedicle screw. The reduction sleeve and the rotatable tube are disposed over and coaxially aligned with the inner shaft. The rotatable tube is coupled to the reduction sleeve. The rotatable tube moves the reduction sleeve relative to the reduction arms. The locking driver includes a threaded portion and a blunt tip. The threaded portion is configured to thread into threads in the receiver of the pedicle screw until the blunt tip locks the receiver of the pedicle screw.