PEEK Implant Surface Roughening for Bone Cement Bond Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tibial implant systems for knee joint replacements face challenges such as difficulty in implantation, weak bond with bone cement, high manufacturing costs, and stress shielding, while also requiring ease of use and resistance to fracture and wear.

Innovation Solution

A modular tibial tray and insert system featuring a polymeric tibial insert that securely engages with either a polymer or metal tibial tray, utilizing a locking mechanism and surface roughening techniques to enhance bond strength with bone cement, and allowing for interchangeable trays to accommodate different implantation methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a monolithic UHMWPE device is used for cement fixation, then stress shielding is resistant and in vivo survival rate is long, but the bond between UHMWPE and bone with bone cement is weak and the device is difficult to implant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein vivo survival rateVSAvoidbond strength between UHMWPE and bone cement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite material structure consisting of a polymeric tibial tray (PEEK) and a metal reinforcement cage (titanium alloy). This composite structure provides both the biocompatibility and stress distribution benefits of polymer and the high bond strength with bone cement of metal, resolving the contradiction between weak bond strength and reliable fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The metal reinforcement cage is strategically placed only in the regions requiring high bond strength with bone cement, while the majority of the tibial tray remains as polymer to provide stress distribution and biocompatibility. This localized application of different materials optimizes both bond strength and overall device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a metal-backed UHMWPE modular tibia is used, then the device is easier to implant, but the system is expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implantationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The polymeric tibial tray is designed to provide multiple functions: structural support, stress distribution, biocompatibility, and bone cement fixation. By making the polymer perform all these functions rather than requiring a metal backplate, the system achieves ease of implantation while reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the essential function of bone cement fixation from the metal backplate and transfers it to the polymeric tibial tray through surface treatment. This eliminates the need for the expensive metal-backplate construction while maintaining the ease of implantation benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a polymer-porous metal composite is used for cement-less fixation, then the bond without bone cement is achieved, but the cement-less bond is weaker than bond using bone cement and devices are expensive to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecement-less implantation capabilityVSAvoidbond strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic adaptability by allowing selection between two fixation methods: bone cement fixation for maximum bond strength, or cement-less fixation using the porous metal cage for biological integration. The design accommodates different clinical requirements and patient conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The metal reinforcement cage is segmented into a porous structure that allows bone ingrowth for cement-less fixation, while also providing a framework for bone cement application when needed. This segmented design enables both fixation methods to be utilized as clinically appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a stronger, more sustainable bond with bone cement, reduces stress shielding, and lowers manufacturing costs, while providing ease of use and improved resistance to wear and fracture, with the option for cementless implantation.

Implementation Method 1

blasting a water soluble abrasive powder against the PEEK implant to achieve a certain average surface roughness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS9193033B2Method of improving bond strength of polymeric implants with bone cement
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
  • US9193033B2 patent drawing
  • US9193033B2 patent drawing
  • US9193033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving the bond between a PEEK joint component and bone cement comprising roughening a surface of the PEEK component by air-blasting abrasive water-soluble particles against the component until an average surface roughness of 4 to 6 micrometers is attained and subsequently submerging the component in water to dissolve any residual particles.