Peelable Sacrificial Structure for Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing methods require complex and costly processes for removing sacrificial structures, which are not suitable for home or office use due to the need for dedicated equipment and potential mess, and often involve hazardous materials or long dissolution times.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for additive manufacturing that uses a flexible material as a sacrificial structure, which can be easily peeled away from the object in a dry environment, along with a soft material for intermediate support, allowing for quick and tidy removal without solvents or dedicated equipment, and a compact inkjet printing system that can produce full-colored objects with a peelable sacrificial structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If water-jet impact or chemical dissolution methods are used to remove support materials, then the sacrificial structure can be removed, but the process becomes complex, costly, and requires dedicated equipment that is not suitable for home or office use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval process simplicityVSAvoiddedicated equipment requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical removal systems (water-jet impact devices, chemical dissolution equipment) with a simple manual peeling action. The flexible material is designed to be peelable by hand, eliminating the need for dedicated removal equipment and making the process suitable for home or office use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible sacrificial structure is designed as a disposable component that is easily removed and discarded after serving its support function. This aligns with the principle of using cheap, short-living objects where the removal process is simplified by accepting the sacrificial material as single-use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of manufacture

If chemical dissolution methods are used to remove support materials, then the sacrificial structure can be removed, but hazardous materials and potential mess are involved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval process cleanlinessVSAvoidhazardous materials exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes chemical dissolution methods with a mechanical peeling action. Instead of using solvents or chemicals that create hazardous conditions and mess, the flexible material is simply peeled off the printed object by hand, eliminating exposure to harmful substances and keeping the work environment clean.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If water soluble support material is used, then the sacrificial structure can be removed by immersion, but the process requires long dissolution times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval process speedVSAvoiddissolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the slow chemical dissolution process with a fast mechanical peeling action. The flexible sacrificial structure is designed to be manually peeled off in seconds, eliminating the hours-long immersion time required for water-soluble support materials to dissolve completely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the removal mechanism from a time-dependent chemical dissolution process to an instantaneous mechanical peeling process. By altering the removal method from chemical to mechanical, the time parameter is dramatically reduced from hours to seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If a single flexible material is used for both the sacrificial structure and intermediate support, then material selection is simplified, but the intermediate structure may not provide adequate support during peeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selection simplicityVSAvoidsupport structure adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the support structure. The sacrificial structure uses a peelable flexible material, while the intermediate support structure uses a stiffer material with higher elastic modulus to provide adequate mechanical support during the peeling process. This local differentiation of material properties ensures both peelability and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite support system combining two different materials: a flexible peelable material for the sacrificial structure and a stiffer material for the intermediate support. This composite approach allows each material to perform its specific function optimally - the flexible material enables easy removal while the stiffer material provides necessary structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and environmentally friendly removal of sacrificial structures, reducing waste and operational complexity, while maintaining the mechanical properties of the printed object, and is suitable for home or office use with a compact and user-friendly printing system.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible material and forming a sacrificial structure... having an elastic modulus less than the flexible material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

3D printing processes, for example, 3D inkjet printing, are being performed by a layer by layer inkjet deposition of building materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInkjet deposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 3

sequentially dispensing and solidifying a plurality of layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS20240149521A1Method and system for additive manufacturing of peelable sacrificial structure
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 STRATASYS LTD
  • US20240149521A1 patent drawing
  • US20240149521A1 patent drawing
  • US20240149521A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of additive manufacturing of a three-dimensional object includes sequentially dispensing and solidifying a plurality of layers. The plurality of layers may be formed with a plurality of different colored model materials, a flexible material arranged in a configured pattern to form a sacrificial structure at least partially encompassing the object, and a soft material. The soft material is arranged in a configured pattern to provide separation between the model material and the sacrificial structure. The plurality of different colored model materials is arranged in a configured pattern corresponding to the shape and color definition of the object.