Remaining Life Estimation Using Peer Equipment Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting the remaining useful life of equipment subsystems are limited by the need for costly detailed materials knowledge, availability of run-to-end-of-life data, and reliance on constant load conditions, which are often not feasible for complex and expensive systems like aircraft engines.

Innovation Solution

A peer-based approach that uses operational data from similar equipment to predict remaining useful life without requiring detailed damage propagation models or run-to-end-of-life data, employing a Fuzzy Instance Model and evolutionary framework to aggregate RUL estimates from peer equipment with similar operational characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a data-driven approach using run-to-end-of-equipment-useful-life data is employed, then pattern recognition algorithms can predict remaining life, but such data are often not available because faults are repaired before they lead to end of useful life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremaining life prediction accuracyVSAvoidavailability of run-to-end-of-life data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of equipment by developing digital twins that replicate the behavior and degradation patterns of physical equipment. These digital copies allow analysts to study failure modes and predict remaining life without requiring actual run-to-end-of-life data from physical equipment, as the digital twins can be configured to simulate various failure scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary damage propagation modeling to predict future equipment states before actual failure occurs. By using physics-based models to simulate damage accumulation and propagation, the system can estimate remaining life based on current equipment state and projected future conditions, rather than requiring historical data from complete failure cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a peer-based approach is used to forecast reliability, then equipment selection can improve mission reliability, but this approach does not provide prognostic insight regarding components or sub-components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission reliabilityVSAvoidcomponent-level prognostic capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the equipment into hierarchical levels (system level, subsystem level, component level) and applies appropriate prediction methods at each level. This allows the system to provide both fleet-level reliability forecasting and component-level prognostic insights by breaking down the complex prediction problem into manageable segments that can be analyzed independently and then integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a multi-functional prognostic platform that serves multiple purposes: fleet-wide reliability forecasting, component-level remaining life prediction, maintenance optimization, and failure mode analysis. This universal approach allows the same system to address both high-level mission reliability concerns and detailed component-level diagnostic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed materials knowledge and finite element modeling are used, then damage propagation can be modeled, but the models are extremely costly to develop and must be limited to a few important parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage propagation modeling accuracyVSAvoidmodel development cost and scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using detailed physics-based damage propagation models only for critical components where high accuracy is essential, while using simpler data-driven or peer-based approaches for less critical parts. This selective application of modeling complexity optimizes resource allocation by concentrating computational and developmental efforts on components that most impact overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a composite prognostic approach that combines multiple modeling techniques (physics-based damage propagation, data-driven pattern recognition, and peer-based reliability forecasting) into an integrated framework. This composite methodology leverages the strengths of each approach while mitigating their individual weaknesses, providing accurate predictions without the prohibitive costs of applying detailed finite element modeling system-wide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS7725293B2System and method for equipment remaining life estimation
Publication Date: 2010.05.25 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US7725293B2 patent drawing
  • US7725293B2 patent drawing
  • US7725293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to predict remaining life of a target is disclosed. The method includes receiving information regarding a behavior of the target, and identifying from a database at least one piece of equipment having similarities to the target. The method further includes retrieving from the database data prior to an end of the equipment useful life, the data having a relationship to the behavior, evaluating a similarity of the relationship, predicting the remaining life of the target based upon the similarity, and generating a signal corresponding to the predicted remaining equipment life.