Peer-to-Peer Package Delivery With AI Pricing and Flight Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing delivery systems are inefficient and costly, particularly for individuals or small businesses requiring fast, and they lack real-time tracking, secure communication, and intelligent pricing algorithms to ensure trust and efficiency in the logistics process.

Innovation Solution

A modular client-server architecture with a mobile application and web interface, integrating neural networks and real-time tracking, and a privacy-preserving federated learning architecture to ensure secure communication and data confidentiality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional shipping providers are used, then delivery service is provided, but shipping costs are high and delivery times are long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery timeVSAvoiddelivery cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables passengers to voluntarily offer their unused luggage capacity for transporting packages, transforming them from passive travelers into active logistics providers. This self-service approach allows individuals to monetize their unused capacity while providing affordable delivery options, directly reducing delivery costs and time without relying on traditional logistics infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts pricing based on multiple parameters including flight distance, available luggage capacity, package weight, and delivery urgency. This parameter-based pricing model optimizes the balance between delivery speed and cost, allowing flexible pricing that reflects actual resource utilization and market conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If centralized logistics infrastructure is used, then package delivery is enabled, but shipping fees increase and delivery duration extends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery speedVSAvoidlogistics infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the core delivery function from complex centralized logistics infrastructure and relocates it to individual passengers during their travel. By removing the need for warehouses, distribution centers, and extensive ground networks, the system achieves fast delivery using only the passenger's existing luggage space and movement, dramatically simplifying the logistics infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Passengers serve multiple functions simultaneously: they are travelers, carriers, and delivery providers. The system enables unused luggage capacity to be converted into productive delivery resources, making the passenger's existing travel infrastructure serve dual purposes and eliminating the need for dedicated logistics facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional shipping frameworks are used, then delivery service is provided, but scheduling flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidoperational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the static, fixed-route nature of traditional logistics into a dynamic model where delivery capacity moves with passenger travel schedules. As passengers book and cancel flights, the available delivery capacity dynamically adjusts, allowing the system to adapt to changing delivery demands and provide flexible scheduling without rigid operational constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors passenger availability, flight schedules, and delivery requests, using this feedback to optimize matching and pricing in real-time. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to changing conditions, adjust to urgent delivery needs, and maintain flexibility while managing operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Quantity of substance

If physical warehousing is used, then package storage is enabled, but shipping fees increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage capacityVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Passengers voluntarily offer their unused luggage capacity for package transport, eliminating the need for paid warehousing infrastructure. This self-service approach converts idle personal space into productive delivery capacity, providing storage and transport without the overhead costs of commercial warehousing facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers and utilizes the otherwise wasted luggage capacity that passengers have when traveling with unused allowance. By discarding the conventional approach of leaving this capacity idle and instead recovering it for package transport, the system eliminates warehousing costs while maintaining delivery capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20250371486A1System and Method for Peer-to-Peer Package Delivery
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 SARWAR MANSOOR
  • US20250371486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371486A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A crowd-sourced package delivery system is disclosed. The system comprises a mobile application and browser-accessible interface linked to a backend server comprising modules for user management, package information, matching and recommendation, payment processing, fraud detection, and flight tracking. A machine learning-based pricing engine computes delivery prices using structured inputs including route distance, item weight, item category, and flight date. A multi-phase non-linear weight pricing function and price ceiling constraint ensure cost-effectiveness. The pricing model employs a hybrid neural network architecture incorporating embedding layers, graph attention networks, and quantile regression output with contextual attention mechanisms. A composite loss function balances quantile accuracy, market competitiveness, and elasticity modeling.