Peer-to-Peer EV Charging With Multi-Level Battery Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is hindered by limitations in battery range, charging time, and the lack of accessible charging stations, with current methods requiring vehicles to be stationary during charging and relying on fixed locations, which is inefficient and inconvenient.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multi-level battery systems with different charge transfer rates and a cloud-based control system for peer-to-peer charging, allowing EVs to charge each other on-the-go and optimize charge distribution within a network, using algorithms to manage charge transactions and route adjustments for efficient energy transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicles are charged at fixed charging stations, then charging infrastructure is established, but vehicles must be stationary during charging which reduces operational efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging availabilityVSAvoidvehicle operational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having stationary charging stations charge parked vehicles, the patent inverts the approach by enabling moving vehicles to charge each other while in motion through peer-to-peer charge transfer, eliminating the need for stationary charging infrastructure and maintaining vehicle operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables vehicles to serve their own charging needs by allowing them to transfer charge to other vehicles directly, creating a self-sustaining charging network where vehicles are both charge sources and charge recipients without requiring external stationary charging infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Duration of action of moving object

If battery capacity is increased to extend range, then vehicle autonomy is improved, but charging time increases and battery weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle rangeVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than requiring complete battery recharging, the system implements partial charge transfers between vehicles during operation, allowing vehicles to top up their batteries incrementally while moving, thus avoiding long charging times while still extending effective range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The charge transfer system enables continuous charging operation by allowing vehicles to exchange charge while in motion, maintaining the useful action of vehicle operation without interruption for stationary recharging, thus eliminating charging time loss from the operational cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multi-level battery systems with different charge transfer rates are implemented, then charge distribution efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge distribution efficiencyVSAvoidbattery system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system is segmented into multiple levels with different charge transfer rates, allowing simultaneous fast and slow charging operations, which improves overall charge distribution efficiency by matching different charging needs within the same system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts charge transfer rates between different battery levels based on real-time operational needs, enabling flexible optimization of charge distribution efficiency while managing complexity through adaptive control rather than fixed configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables EVs to maintain perpetual motion by sharing charges among themselves, reducing the need for fixed charging stations and minimizing charging halts, thereby enhancing the practicality and efficiency of EV use by optimizing charge distribution and transfer.

Implementation Method 1

the power plant can comprise one or more electrochemical cells having a first charge transfer rate; one or more other electrochemical cells having a second charge transfer rate different from the first charge transfer rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS12049151B2Multi-level battery systems for battery-operated entities, methods for rapid charge transfer therebetween, and methods for optimizing entity routing and network charge distribution
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US12049151B2 patent drawing
  • US12049151B2 patent drawing
  • US12049151B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, systems, and methods described herein relate generally to on-the-go entity-to-entity charging for multi-level battery-powered entities in transportation systems. A method can include determining charge levels, current positions, battery configuration, and transport speeds for an electric vehicle (EV), identifying one or more EVs in need of charging, and mobilizing a nearby EV for on-the-go peer-to-peer charging. A processor, with a memory including computer program code, can be configured to receive current charge level data for mobile battery-powered entities, identify one or more EVs to be charged and one or more other EVs that have excess charge to transfer, and send charging instructions to the EVs. A routing and charge transaction scheduling algorithm can be used to optimize the route of one or more battery-powered entities and to schedule charge transactions between EVs and/or a charging entity. A heuristic battery architecture compiler can be used to optimize battery architecture.