Peer Influence Measurement via Behavior Deviation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional parental control systems lack the ability to provide a comprehensive assessment of a child's behavior and identify significant changes, failing to effectively measure peer influence on a child's actions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that monitor computing activity on a child's endpoint devices to identify baseline behaviors, detect unusual behaviors associated with peers, determine the level of peer influence, and perform security actions to prevent potentially harmful behaviors by providing guardians with the level of peer influence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional parental control systems are used to restrict computing behavior, then basic restrictions can be imposed, but comprehensive assessment of child's behavior and identification of peer influence cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior assessment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments behavior monitoring into distinct components: baseline behavior identification, unusual behavior detection, peer association analysis, and influence level determination. Each component processes specific aspects of computing activity independently, then integrates results to provide comprehensive behavior assessment without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer that connects computing activity monitoring with peer influence assessment. This intermediary component processes raw monitoring data through behavioral pattern recognition and peer association algorithms, transforming basic activity logs into meaningful insights about peer influence while maintaining manageable system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If monitoring of computing activity is implemented to identify behavior patterns, then baseline behaviors can be established, but real-time detection of peer influence and immediate intervention become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior pattern recognition accuracyVSAvoidresponse time to unusual behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously establishing and updating baseline behavior patterns during normal monitoring periods. These pre-established baselines enable rapid comparison against current activity, allowing immediate detection of deviations without requiring complex real-time analysis when unusual behavior occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detected unusual behaviors trigger immediate notifications to guardians and can automatically initiate security actions. The system continuously compares current behavior against established baselines, provides real-time feedback when deviations are detected, and adjusts monitoring parameters based on guardian responses, creating a rapid response loop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10061916B1Systems and methods for measuring peer influence on a child
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US10061916B1 patent drawing
  • US10061916B1 patent drawing
  • US10061916B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method for measuring peer influence on a child may include (i) monitoring computing activity on at least one endpoint device of a child to identify (a) baseline behaviors that indicate expected behavior patterns of the child (b) an unusual behavior of the child that indicates a deviation from the baseline behaviors, (ii) identifying, based at least in part on the monitored computing activity, a peer of the child associated with the unusual behavior, (iii) determining, based at least in part on a comparison between the baseline behaviors and the unusual behavior, a level of influence the peer has on the child, and then (iv) performing a computing security action that prevents the child from engaging in potentially harmful behaviors by providing, to a guardian of the child, the level of influence of the peer. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.