Peer Mobile Router Authentication via Home Agent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for authenticating peer mobile routers in multi-homed mobile networks are unstable due to the mobility of mobile routers, which affects seamless mobility and load distribution in NEMO networks.

Innovation Solution

A method where a mobile router authenticates a peer mobile router through a home agent, using a peer mobile router authentication process that includes a PMR request, PMR authentication request, and Return Routability authentication, establishing a stable peer relationship and enabling multiple Care-of Addresses registration for seamless service and load distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mobile routers perform direct Return Routability authentication with each other, then authentication can be performed peer-to-peer, but authentication stability deteriorates due to router mobility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeer-to-peer authentication capabilityVSAvoidauthentication stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Home Agent as an intermediary between mobile routers for authentication. Instead of direct peer-to-peer Return Routability authentication which is unstable due to mobility, the mobile router authenticates with the Home Agent which then facilitates authentication with peer mobile routers. This mediator approach stabilizes the authentication process while maintaining peer interaction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If only one primary Care-of Address is registered, then the mobile IPv6 protocol remains simple, but seamless mobility and load distribution cannot be supported

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol simplicityVSAvoidseamless mobility support
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic registration and management of multiple Care-of Addresses at the mobile router. The system can dynamically add, remove, or update CoAs based on network conditions and mobility requirements, allowing seamless mobility and load distribution while maintaining manageable complexity through structured protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the Care-of Address management by allowing multiple independent CoA registrations instead of a single unified address. Each CoA can be managed independently with its own binding cache entry, enabling load distribution across multiple addresses while maintaining clear protocol structures for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple Care-of Addresses are registered, then seamless mobility and load distribution are enabled, but the binding update protocol complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseamless mobility supportVSAvoidbinding update protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by establishing binding cache entries for multiple Care-of Addresses in advance. The Home Agent pre-configures and maintains multiple CoA bindings, so when mobility or load distribution is needed, the system can switch between addresses without complex real-time protocol negotiations, reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP1911193B1Peer mobile router authentication method for multi-homed mobile networks
Publication Date: 2013.06.19 KT CORP
  • EP1911193B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1911193B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1911193B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided are a peer MR authentication method, a multiple peer CoAs registration method, a failover method for multi-homed mobile networks, and a computer readable recording medium thereof. The registering method includes the steps of : a) determining whether a second MR is around a first MR; b) at the first MR, transmitting a peer request message to the second MR; c) at the first MR, requesting a HA of the first MR to authenticate the second MR; d) at the HA, transmitting a peer registering request message to the second MR with a prefix of the first MR that transmit the authentication request message to perform RR authentication; and e) at the HA, notifying the authentication result of the second MR to the first MR when receiving a RR authentication result message including the prefix of the first MR to be registered as a peer from the second MR.