Peer Storage Grouping for Network Controller Bottlenecks
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Modern data storage systems experience performance bottlenecks and inefficiencies due to mismanagement of system resources, leading to degraded efficiency, security, and reliability as centralized network components struggle with increased workload volumes.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a peer-to-peer data storage system where tasks are intelligently diverted from centralized network controllers to downstream devices, forming peer groups with master-slave relationships to optimize processing and maintain data transfer performance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If tasks are handled by centralized network controllers, then coordination and control are simplified, but processing capacity and reliability are insufficient under increased workload volumes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the centralized control function into distributed peer groups of storage devices. Each peer group independently manages its own tasks, dividing the overall system workload into smaller manageable units. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure at the centralized controller while maintaining coordinated control through peer-to-peer communication protocols.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically changes operational parameters by forming and dissolving peer groups based on real-time workload conditions. When workload increases, additional peer groups are formed to distribute tasks. The system monitors performance metrics and adjusts group configurations accordingly, transforming from a static centralized structure to a dynamic distributed architecture.
2Productivity
If more storage devices are added to increase capacity, then data storage and processing capability improve, but system complexity and resource management difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent organizes individual storage devices into peer groups, segmenting the large-scale system into smaller manageable units. Each peer group handles specific tasks independently, reducing the complexity of managing individual devices while collectively providing enhanced processing capability. The peer control circuit manages these segments automatically without requiring complex centralized coordination.
Solution Approach 2:
Storage devices within peer groups perform self-management functions including task assignment, resource allocation, and failure detection. The peer control circuit automatically provisions new devices into appropriate peer groups and monitors system health, eliminating the need for complex manual resource management while scaling capacity as needed.
3Ease of operation
If centralized network controllers handle all tasks, then control is centralized and simplified, but performance bottlenecks occur under high workload
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the processing workload by creating multiple peer groups that operate in parallel. Instead of a single centralized controller handling all tasks sequentially, multiple peer groups process tasks concurrently, dramatically increasing throughput. The peer control circuit maintains simplified control by automatically assigning tasks to appropriate peer groups based on workload distribution.
Solution Approach 2:
The system transitions from a single-point control model to a multi-dimensional distributed control architecture. Peer groups are organized in hierarchical layers with peer control circuits at different levels coordinating tasks across the network. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous processing at multiple levels, increasing throughput while maintaining operational simplicity through automated task routing.
Data Source
AI summary
Method and apparatus for offloading upstream processing tasks to peer groups of downstream data storage devices. A peer control circuit forms a peer group of storage devices in response to a detected processing bottleneck associated with a network controller. One of the storage devices in the peer group is designated as a primary device, and is responsible for interface communications, for subdividing the processing task for execution by secondary devices in the peer group, and coordinating overall execution. The peer group and the processing task are selected to avoid or minimize the processing bottleneck at the network controller level while maintaining ongoing data transfer performance at the storage device level. A list of available device resources and capabilities may be maintained by the peer control circuit. Offloaded tasks can include data rebuilds, cryptographic functions, new device authentication operations, and the like. Multiple overlapping peer groups can be formed as needed.