Peer-to-Peer Print Server Control for Secure Production Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In industrial printing systems, there is a lack of efficient and secure distributed processing methods for production printing that prevent data leakage and human error, especially when multiple printers are involved in producing a final product.

Innovation Solution

An industrial printing system with a prohibition management unit that generates settings to restrict printing and processing on other servers, and a processing management unit that sends jobs with these settings to other servers for secure distributed processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If print data is transferred to each MFP and the MFP itself determines processing capability, then the waiting time for users is reduced and processing speed is improved, but data leakage risks and security issues worsen due to distributed access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddata leakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The prohibition management unit generates prohibition settings in advance before job distribution, pre-defining which print servers are prohibited from accessing specific job data. This preliminary restriction prevents data leakage risks before they can occur during distributed processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The prohibition setting acts as an intermediary control mechanism between the job data and the print servers. It mediates access permissions by specifying prohibited destinations, thereby controlling data flow and preventing unauthorized access without affecting the overall distributed processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a central management server is used to control distributed processing, then data security is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each print server autonomously enforces prohibition settings locally without requiring continuous central management server intervention. The prohibition management unit on each server independently determines whether to accept or reject job data based on pre-configured prohibition settings, eliminating the need for complex central coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized management function is segmented and distributed to individual print servers. Each server maintains its own prohibition management unit that independently handles security decisions for its local context, breaking down the complex centralized control into simpler autonomous units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If prohibition settings are generated for each job setting in peer-to-peer processing, then data security is improved by preventing human error, but the complexity of processing management worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against human errorVSAvoidprocessing management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Prohibition settings are generated in advance for each job setting before distribution begins. This preliminary configuration ensures that security restrictions are already in place and automatically enforced during processing, preventing human error without requiring complex real-time management interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of access control from dynamic central authorization to static pre-configured prohibition settings. By transforming the control mechanism into fixed parameters embedded in each job setting, the system simplifies processing management while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250284442A1Industrial printing system, print server, and processing management method for setting prohibition in peer-to-peer production printing
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250284442A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284442A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284442A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an industrial printing system that can improve security while performing peer-to-peer distributed processing in production printing. The industrial printing system performs production printing. A plurality of print servers that perform distributed processing of jobs is provided. Each of the plurality of print servers provides a prohibition management unit and a processing management unit. The prohibition management unit generates a prohibition setting that restrict printing and processing on a distributed print server for each job setting. The processing management unit sends the job associated with the prohibition settings generated by the prohibition management unit to the other print server for processing.