Peer-to-Peer Resource Transfer Authentication with AI Risk Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for enhanced security measures in peer-to-peer resource sharing networks to ensure secure resource transfers.

Innovation Solution

A system that authenticates resource transfers using a shared authentication credential and an AI module to enable or disable additional security checks based on historical data and transfer parameters, ensuring only authorized recipients receive resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If authentication checks are always enabled for resource transfers, then security is improved, but user experience and transfer speed deteriorate due to unnecessary authentication prompts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts authentication requirements based on real-time risk assessment. The AI module continuously evaluates transfer parameters (amount, frequency, recipient history) and automatically enables or disables authentication prompts, making the security mechanism adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by applying authentication only when dynamically determined to be necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (authentication requirements) based on the risk profile of each transfer. By analyzing multiple parameters including transfer amount, recipient relationship, and historical behavior, the system adjusts the authentication state from always-on to conditional, improving user experience while maintaining security for high-risk transfers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If authentication checks are disabled for seamless user experience, then ease of operation is improved, but security deteriorates allowing unauthorized transfers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The AI module performs self-service risk assessment by automatically analyzing transfer parameters and historical data without requiring manual security configuration. It autonomously determines whether authentication is needed, enabling seamless user experience for low-risk transfers while automatically enforcing security for high-risk ones, thus resolving the security-convenience contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where transfer outcomes and risk assessments inform future authentication decisions. The AI module learns from historical transfer data and adjusts authentication requirements based on feedback from previous security events, maintaining high security while minimizing unnecessary authentication prompts for legitimate transfers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If AI-based dynamic authentication is implemented, then security and user experience are balanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI module serves multiple functions simultaneously: it analyzes transfer parameters, assesses risk levels, determines authentication requirements, and learns from historical data. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional module, the system achieves sophisticated security balancing without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI module acts as an intermediary between the user and the authentication system. It automatically mediates the decision-making process by evaluating risk and determining whether authentication prompts should be displayed, eliminating the need for users to manually configure security settings while simplifying the user interface to just show or hide authentication prompts based on AI decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12388819B2Systems and methods for authenticating a resource transfer in a peer-to-peer resource sharing electronic network
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12388819B2 patent drawing
  • US12388819B2 patent drawing
  • US12388819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided for authenticating a resource transfer in a peer-to-peer resource sharing electronic network. In particular, the system may receive a request from a first endpoint device to execute a resource transfer with a second endpoint device. The request from the first endpoint device may comprise a selection or designation of an authentication credential associated with the resource transfer. The system may prompt the second endpoint device for an authentication input. Upon receiving the authentication input from the second endpoint device, the system may validate the authentication input using the authentication credential provided using the first endpoint device. Once the authentication input from the second endpoint device has been validated, the system may execute the resource transfer according to the parameters defined by the first endpoint device. In this way, the system may provide a secure way to execute peer-to-peer resource transfers over a network.