Pegboard Hook Anchor Structure to Prevent Accidental Dislodging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hooks for pegboards are easily dislodged from the board due to their shape and connection, leading to frustration and potential damage or injury when retrieving objects, and lack stability during use.

Innovation Solution

A hook design featuring a vertical central body with L-shaped and U-shaped anchors that securely engage with pegboard holes, a horizontal rod for hanging objects, and additional features like reinforcement ribs and wings for stability, along with a flexible tooth mechanism for secure attachment and easy removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing hooks are made from metal rods with simple connection to pegboard holes, then manufacturing is simple and cost-effective, but the hooks are easily dislodged when bumped or during object retrieval

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehook stabilityVSAvoidanchor mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hook is divided into multiple functional segments: an L-shaped upper anchor for insertion and positioning, a U-shaped lower anchor with teeth for secure engagement, a vertical central body for structural support, and a horizontal rod for hanging objects. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally while collectively providing reliable attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lower anchor incorporates a flexible member with teeth that can dynamically adapt to the pegboard hole geometry. The flexible material allows the teeth to bend and engage securely with the hole edge, then maintain that engagement under load. The lever mechanism provides dynamic control for easy insertion and removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If existing hooks have simple rod shapes, then ease of manufacture is high, but any upward motion dislodges the hook from the pegboard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to dislodgingVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The L-shaped upper anchor and U-shaped lower anchor feature asymmetric geometries specifically designed to resist upward dislodging forces. The L-shape provides lateral support against the pegboard back surface, while the U-shape with downward-pointing teeth mechanically locks against upward motion. These asymmetric forms prevent accidental dislodging while remaining manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The anchor mechanisms extend into multiple spatial dimensions: the L-shaped anchor engages the hole from the front and supports against the back surface (depth dimension), the U-shaped anchor's teeth engage the hole edge (radial dimension), and the overall structure provides vertical support. This multi-dimensional engagement prevents dislodging from simple upward forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If existing hooks are inserted into single holes, then device complexity is low, but stability during use is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment stabilityVSAvoidmulti-anchor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hook combines two distinct anchor mechanisms (L-shaped upper anchor and U-shaped lower anchor) into a single integrated structure. Both anchors are attached to the vertical central body and work together to provide enhanced stability. The upper anchor provides positioning and lateral support, while the lower anchor provides secure mechanical locking, creating a redundant attachment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By using two anchors spaced vertically apart on the pegboard, the hook creates a distributed attachment system across multiple dimensions. The vertical spacing between anchors creates a stable triangular support geometry with the pegboard, resisting both upward dislodging and rotational forces that would occur with a single-hole attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If existing hooks lack retrieval assistance features, then device complexity is low, but object retrieval causes hook dislodging and potential injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject retrieval easeVSAvoidretrieval assistance features
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The raised ends on the horizontal rod provide self-service retrieval assistance by catching on the edges of hanging objects. When pulling an object off the hook, the raised ends engage the object edge and guide it upward, preventing the hook itself from being pulled out of the pegboard hole. This reduces the risk of injury and frustration during retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10226138B2Hook for pegboard
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 TEAR PAUL
  • US10226138B2 patent drawing
  • US10226138B2 patent drawing
  • US10226138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved hook for use with a pegboard is provided. The improved hook has a vertical central body, an L-shaped upper anchor, a U-shaped lower anchor, and a horizontal rod for hanging tools and objects. The L-shaped upper anchor and U-shaped lower anchor are configured to secure the hook on the pegboard such that the hook does not get accidently dislodged from the pegboard. A lever on the U-shaped lower anchor is provided to release the anchor and hook from the pegboard.