Pellet Matrix Fragmentation Weapon

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing directed fragmentation weapons lack the ability to deliver fragments in a consistent and controlled formation, leading to inefficiencies in target distribution and increased collateral damage, which is a concern for both lethal and non-lethal applications.

Innovation Solution

The design of the directed fragmentation weapon incorporates a pellet matrix construction where the depth of compartments is defined by the equation h=C×A, with C ranging from 0.1 to 3, allowing for precise positioning and consistent fragment distribution, enabling flexible and controlled fragment formation post-detonation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a traditional explosive charge is used without a pellet matrix, then the weapon structure is simpler, but the fragment distribution is uncontrolled and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment distribution consistencyVSAvoidpellet matrix construction
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The front wall is segmented into a pellet matrix construction with multiple compartments, each holding a pellet. This segmentation allows precise control over fragment distribution while maintaining consistent formation across detonations. The compartments are arranged in a grid pattern with specific spacing to achieve uniform fragment projection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Pellets are pre-positioned in compartments before detonation occurs. The compartments are formed with specific depths and dimensions to hold pellets in predetermined positions. This preliminary arrangement ensures that when detonation occurs, fragments are distributed in a consistent and controlled formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If compartment depth is increased to improve fragment containment, then fragment distribution consistency improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment formation controlVSAvoidcompartament depth precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The compartment depth is defined by a specific parameter relationship (h=C×A, where C ranges from 0.1 to 3 and A is the pellet diameter). This parameter-based approach allows optimization of fragment containment while simplifying manufacturing. By expressing depth as a multiple of pellet diameter, the design achieves precise control without requiring absolute depth specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If a pellet matrix with fixed compartment depths is used, then fragment distribution is more consistent, but adaptability to different pellet sizes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragment distribution uniformityVSAvoidpellet size flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compartment depth is defined as h=C×A, where A is the pellet diameter and C is a coefficient ranging from 0.1 to 3. This parameter relationship allows the compartment depth to scale with pellet size, maintaining optimal fragment containment and distribution consistency across different pellet dimensions. The coefficient C can be adjusted to optimize performance for specific pellet types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures consistent and controlled fragment distribution across various materials and sizes, reducing collateral damage and enhancing operational safety while allowing for adaptable and cost-effective manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

a detonator arrangement for exploding the explosive material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 2

when a sheet of explosive detonates in contact with a heavy backing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosion: Explosion

Data Source

PatentUS9341454B1Directed fragmentation weapon
Publication Date: 2016.05.17 FORCIT
  • US9341454B1 patent drawing
  • US9341454B1 patent drawing
  • US9341454B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Directed fragmentation weapon including a housing having front, back, top edge, bottom edge and side edge walls defining a closed chamber therein. The front wall is formed as a pellet matrix construction including a plurality of compartments formed as recesses on the surface facing the inside of the chamber. The compartments are substantially similar in shape and size to each other and a plurality of pellets of fixed diameter within the matrix. Each compartment contains one pellet therein. Explosive material is placed into the chamber, which is sufficient to propel the pellets from the matrix, and a detonator arrangement for exploding the material. Depths of a part or all of the compartments measured perpendicularly to the front wall and from the inner surface of the front wall are defined by equationh=C×A  (I)wherein equation coefficient C is 0.1-3, and A is the pellet diameter.