Pellet Press Cutting Device Radial Guide

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pellet press cutting devices are complex and costly, often requiring helical twisting or precise curvature adjustments, leading to inconsistent pellet length and increased production of fines due to frictional forces, which can vary with operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A pellet press design with a cutting device that minimizes distance variation, ensuring uniform pellet length at low cost, featuring a scraper plate with convex curvature and adjustable positioning, and a braking device for gentle deceleration of pellets, reducing fines production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a helical groove or rib is used to deflect pellets axially, then pellet length uniformity is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepellet length uniformityVSAvoidcutting device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the cutting function from the complex helical deflection structure and implements it through a simple radial guide surface combined with a stationary cutting element. The radial guide surface merely guides the pellet without requiring helical twisting, while the cutting action is performed by a separate cutting edge that contacts the pellet end, thereby simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining pellet length uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting device is segmented into distinct functional components: a radial guide surface for guiding the pellet, and a separate cutting element for the actual cutting action. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies manufacturing compared to a monolithic helical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a radial guide surface with friction is used to deflect pellets, then pellet deflection is achieved, but production of fines increases and cutting point becomes inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepellet deflectionVSAvoidcutting point consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful frictional force that causes inconsistent cutting and fines production into a beneficial guiding mechanism. The radial guide surface uses controlled friction to gently guide the pellet along a predetermined path without requiring high friction coefficients, and the cutting occurs at a defined geometric point rather than depending on friction-based deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The radial guide surface acts as an intermediary between the pellet and the cutting element. It guides the pellet in a controlled manner along its curved path, ensuring the pellet reaches the cutting point in a consistent position and orientation, thereby eliminating the inconsistency caused by direct friction-based deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the cutting device is positioned close to the ring die, then pellet length control is improved, but risk of collision with new pellets increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepellet length controlVSAvoidpellet processing stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting device is positioned at an optimized distance from the ring die that balances two requirements: close enough to maintain precise control over pellet length, but far enough to allow newly extruded pellets to clear the die surface. The radial guide surface is specifically designed with its curvature and positioning to achieve this local optimization, ensuring both precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves uniform pellet length with reduced production of fines by abruptly decelerating pellets at the breaking point and guiding them away from the ring die, optimizing the processing and management of broken pellets.

Implementation Method 1

a braking device with an impact zone... which slows down the pellets gently

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

the production of pellets of the most uniform length possible... compression breakage of protruding pellets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3202562B1Pellet press
Publication Date: 2021.08.18 SALMATEC GMBH
  • EP3202562B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3202562B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3202562B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To specify a pellet press (1) for pressing pellets (8) starting from a pressing material (5), comprising a rotatable ring die (3) having essentially radial through-holes (9) and forming a pressing chamber (4) inside into which the pressing material (5) can be fed, pressing means (6) for pressing the pressing material (5) through the through-holes (9) to form the pellet (8), and at least one cutting device (11) having a contact area for a pellet (8) projecting beyond the ring die (3) in its radial direction, which is attached to a stationary housing part (10) of the pellet press (1) such that the contact area is arranged in the radially outer region of the rotatably mounted ring die (3) at a radial distance from it, in which the production of pellets of the most uniform length is possible cost-effectively while avoiding the disadvantages of the prior art, it is proposed thatthat the contact area extends in the circumferential direction of the ring die (3) from a front azimuth angle (16) to a rear azimuth angle (19) that is larger with respect to a designated rotation direction (13) of the ring die (3), wherein the distance to the ring die (3) is variable depending on the azimuth angle (16, 17, 19).