Pelvic CT Image Fracture Detection Using Hierarchical Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing pelvic CT images are inefficient in automatically detecting and segmenting pelvic bones and fractures, due to limited resolution, variations in bone tissues, and complex geometrical characteristics, which hinders accurate diagnostic decisions and treatment planning in traumatic pelvic injuries.

Innovation Solution

A hierarchical segmentation approach using morphological operations, image enhancement, edge detection, template-based shape matching, and a Registered Active Shape Model (RASM) for robust bone segmentation, combined with wavelet transformation and adaptive windowing for fracture detection, enabling automated and accurate extraction of fracture features and severity assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated detection and segmentation methods are used for pelvic bone fractures, then productivity and speed of diagnosis are improved, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to limited image resolution, bone tissue variations, and complex fracture geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of diagnosisVSAvoidaccuracy of fracture detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex task of pelvic fracture detection into multiple stages: preliminary bone segmentation to identify pelvic bone structures, followed by fracture-specific detection algorithms that analyze segmented regions. This multi-level segmentation approach enables automated processing while maintaining precision by focusing computational resources on relevant anatomical structures and fracture patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters based on image characteristics, bone variations, and fracture types. By adapting thresholds, sensitivity levels, and analysis depth according to the specific clinical case, the system maintains high accuracy across diverse scenarios while enabling rapid automated assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of all CT image data is performed, then measurement precision and diagnostic accuracy are improved, but loss of time and productivity worsen due to the large quantity of data requiring analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of diagnosisVSAvoidtime for data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses analysis on the most clinically relevant features and regions from the comprehensive CT dataset. By identifying and prioritizing key diagnostic indicators such as fracture lines, displacement patterns, and critical anatomical structures, the system achieves high diagnostic accuracy without requiring exhaustive analysis of all image data, thereby reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary bone segmentation and preprocessing of CT images before detailed fracture analysis. This preparatory step organizes the data structure, identifies regions of interest, and pre-processes images to enhance relevant features, enabling subsequent rapid and accurate fracture detection without requiring full comprehensive analysis of the entire dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If simple visual inspection methods are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision and reliability of fracture detection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of inspectionVSAvoidaccuracy of fracture detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs detection, segmentation, and analysis functions that would otherwise require complex manual operations by radiologists. The system independently processes images, identifies fractures, and generates diagnostic recommendations, maintaining ease of operation by requiring minimal user intervention while achieving superior measurement precision through computational algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If existing decision-making systems extract features from medical images, then reliability and diagnostic support are improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for advanced image processing and analysis algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic support qualityVSAvoidcomplexity of processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions including bone segmentation, fracture detection, feature extraction, and diagnostic support into a single unified platform. By combining these functions that operate on common processed data structures and share computational resources, the system achieves high reliability through comprehensive analysis while managing overall complexity through functional integration rather than separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9480439B2Segmentation and fracture detection in CT images
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV
  • US9480439B2 patent drawing
  • US9480439B2 patent drawing
  • US9480439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a new hierarchical methodology having a series of computational steps such as adaptive window creation, 2-D SWT application, masking, and boundary tracing is proposed. The techniques and systems are able to detect and quantify fracture as well as to generate recommendations for decision-making and treatment planning in traumatic pelvic injuries.