Pentane Isomerization and Oligomerization Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processes for upgrading light alkanes to value-added products are not well-suited for hydrocarbon feed streams primarily comprising pentanes, limiting the efficient conversion of pentanes to more valuable products like transportation fuels and chemicals, while also producing undesirable C1-C4 light paraffins.

Innovation Solution

The process involves separating a hydrocarbon feed stream rich in pentanes into isopentane and n-pentane fractions, catalytically activating the isopentane fraction to produce olefins and aromatics, isomerizing n-pentane to isopentane, and oligomerizing the activation effluent to increase the yield of aliphatic hydrocarbons suitable for liquid transportation fuels, while minimizing the production of C1-C4 paraffins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional processes are used to upgrade light alkanes, then some value-added products are produced, but the processes are not well-suited for pentane-rich feed streams and produce undesirable C1-C4 light paraffins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiency of pentanes to value-added productsVSAvoidproduction of C1-C4 light paraffins
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the pentane-rich feed stream into two fractions based on volatility: a light fraction (higher vapor pressure) and a heavy fraction (lower vapor pressure). The light fraction is directed to catalytic activation to produce olefins and aromatics, while the heavy fraction undergoes isomerization. This segmentation allows each fraction to be processed optimally, improving conversion efficiency while minimizing unwanted C1-C4 paraffin production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes the volatility parameter by separating the feed stream into fractions with different vapor pressures. This parameter change enables selective processing: the light fraction (higher volatility) is activated catalytically, while the heavy fraction (lower volatility) is isomerized. This resolves the contradiction by matching process conditions to feed composition, improving productivity while reducing harmful C1-C4 paraffin formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the hydrocarbon feed stream is separated into fractions, then selective processing improves product yield, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of upgraded productsVSAvoidcomplexity of separation and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process divides the complex upgrading task into two simpler, specialized processing paths: catalytic activation for the light fraction and isomerization for the heavy fraction. This segmentation improves product yield by optimizing conditions for each fraction while keeping individual unit operations relatively simple, thus managing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The separation unit serves multiple functions: it divides the feed stream into processable fractions, enables selective catalytic activation of the light fraction, and prepares the heavy fraction for isomerization. This multi-functionality improves productivity without proportionally increasing device complexity, as one separation unit enables multiple downstream processing benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If isopentane fraction is catalytically activated, then olefins and aromatics are produced, but the process requires specific temperature and pressure conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction of olefins and aromaticsVSAvoidprocess condition control requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process applies different quality treatments to different fractions: the light fraction receives catalytic activation at specific high temperature and pressure conditions to maximize olefin and aromatic production, while the heavy fraction undergoes isomerization at different conditions. This local quality approach optimizes productivity for each fraction without requiring the entire system to operate under uniformly complex conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The process changes temperature and pressure parameters specifically for the catalytic activation of the light fraction to optimize olefin and aromatic production. By applying parameter changes only where needed (in the catalytic activation unit) rather than throughout the entire system, the process achieves high productivity while limiting the scope of complex condition control requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the yield of upgraded products suitable for transportation fuels and chemicals, effectively converting a significant portion of the hydrocarbon feed stock to valuable olefins and aromatics while reducing the formation of less desirable C1-C4 light hydrocarbons.

Implementation Method 1

a first fraction that comprises at least 80% of the isopentane present in the hydrocarbon feed stream and that further comprises at least 90% of hydrocarbons present in the hydrocarbon feed stream that are characterized by a vapor pressure equal to or greater than the vapor pressure of isopentane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor pressure difference: Vapour Pressure

Implementation Method 2

contacting the first fraction with an activation catalyst at conditions comprising a temperature and pressure that facilitate catalytic activation of at least a portion of the first fraction by the first activation catalyst to produce an activation effluent comprising olefins containing from two to five carbon atoms, monocyclic aromatics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic activation: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

contacting a second portion the second fraction with one or more isomerization catalysts in an isomerization reactor that is maintained at a temperature and a pressure that facilitates the isomerization of at least a portion of the n-pentane in the second fraction to produce isopentane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIsomerization: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

oligomerizing at least a portion of the activation effluent of c) by contacting it with an oligomerization catalyst at conditions of temperature and pressure that facilitate the conversion of the activation effluent to produce an oligomerization effluent comprising an increased percentage of aliphatic hydrocarbons containing from six to nine carbon atoms

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOligomerization: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10865168B2Isomerization, catalytic activation and oligomerization of pentane-enriched hydrocarbon mixtures
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 PHILLIPS 66 CO
  • US10865168B2 patent drawing
  • US10865168B2 patent drawing
  • US10865168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes for producing liquid transportation fuels by converting a hydrocarbon feed stream comprising both isopentane and n-pentane. The hydrocarbon feed stream is separated into a first fraction that predominantly comprises isopentane and a second fraction that predominantly comprises n-pentane and some C6 paraffins. The first fraction is catalytically activated to produce an activation effluent comprising olefins and aromatics, while the second fraction is isomerized to convert at least a portion of the n-pentane to isopentane, then combined with the hydrocarbon feed stream to allow the newly-produced isopentane to be separated into the first fraction. Finally, the activation effluent is oligomerized. The process produced increased yields of products that meet specifications for a blend component of liquid transportation fuels.