Peptide Array Binding Prediction via Computational Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for characterizing antibody binding on peptide arrays are costly, limited in scalability, and suffer from reproducibility issues, making it challenging to design arrays for specific applications and predict interactions not directly on the array.

Innovation Solution

The development of simulation tools and algorithms that allow for the prediction of binding properties by processing interactions between defined molecules and a training sample, enabling the design of peptide arrays that can bind specific antibodies and predict interactions for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional experimental methods are used to characterize antibody binding on peptide arrays, then binding properties can be measured, but the process is costly, low-throughput, and lacks scalability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput of binding characterizationVSAvoidaccuracy of binding property measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a computational copy (in silico array) that mirrors the physical peptide array. This virtual array processes binding data through algorithms to predict antibody interactions, enabling high-throughput characterization without the cost and scalability limitations of physical experimentation while maintaining measurement precision through rigorous computational modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/experimental binding assay system with a computational simulation system. Instead of physically measuring antibody binding to peptides on a chip, the system uses algorithms to process binding data and predict interactions, substituting physical measurement with computational analysis to achieve high throughput and scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional binding analysis methods are used, then specific binding interactions can be detected, but reproducibility issues arise and the process is not scalable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of binding resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of array manufacturing and analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a reproducible computational model that can be consistently applied across different datasets and experiments. The in silico array and associated algorithms provide a standardized framework for analyzing binding data, eliminating the variability and reproducibility issues inherent in physical array manufacturing and experimental procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the analysis from physical parameters (signal intensity, binding affinity measurements) to computational parameters (binding predictions, interaction scores). This parameter transformation enables standardized, reproducible results that are not affected by manufacturing variability or experimental conditions, while reducing overall system complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive binding characterization is performed on all molecules, then complete binding properties are obtained, but the process becomes costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of binding characterizationVSAvoidtime required for binding analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a computational copy of the peptide array to perform comprehensive binding characterization. The in silico array can simultaneously evaluate all peptides against all antibodies in the dataset, providing complete binding properties without the time-consuming sequential experimentation required for physical arrays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The computational system operates continuously without interruption, processing binding data and generating predictions simultaneously across all peptides and antibodies. This continuous computational action eliminates the sequential, time-consuming nature of experimental assays, achieving comprehensive characterization in a fraction of the time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11978534B1Prediction of binding from binding data in peptide and other arrays
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11978534B1 patent drawing
  • US11978534B1 patent drawing
  • US11978534B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices and methods for predicting binding on an array such as a peptide array. Certain methods utilize a peptide array having a plurality of peptides with one or more defined parameters and contacting the peptide array with a training sample containing one or more molecules of interest. Interactions between the plurality of peptides and the one or more molecules of interest are processed according to a data fitting model, which model is then is applied to interactions between the plurality of peptides and a test sample to predict binding associated with the one or more molecules of interest.