Peptide Modification Site Search via Main Chain Fixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods are inadequate for predicting the binding free energy of a target molecule and a peptide drug candidate due to large structural fluctuations, leading to delayed drug development processes relying on researcher intuition rather than efficient methodologies.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a computer-based calculation of a stable steric structure of a peptide molecule by fixing its main chain configuration, followed by comparison with its complex structure to identify side chains with differing steric configurations, using an annealing method to efficiently search for modification sites.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional binding free energy prediction methods are used for peptide molecules, then the methodology can be applied, but sufficient sampling is difficult due to large structural fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding free energy prediction accuracyVSAvoidstructural fluctuation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The peptide molecule's steric structure is segmented into two independent parts: the main chain and the side chains. By fixing the main chain configuration and only optimizing the side chain rotamer angles, the complex conformational sampling problem is divided into a simpler sub-problem that can be efficiently solved using annealing methods on the Ising model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the optimization parameters from full conformational sampling to specifically optimizing side chain rotamer angles while keeping the main chain fixed. This parameter transformation enables efficient calculation of binding free energy by reducing the search space to only the essential rotational degrees of freedom of side chains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If peptide molecules are modified to enhance binding activity through researcher experience and intuition, then binding activity can be improved, but development is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding activityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Before actual experimentation, the method performs preliminary computational identification of optimal side chain rotamer configurations and predicts their binding free energies. This allows researchers to pre-determine the most promising modification sites and configurations, guiding subsequent experimental work and reducing trial-and-error time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method provides quantitative feedback by calculating binding free energy changes for different side chain configurations. This feedback mechanism allows researchers to objectively evaluate which modifications are most likely to enhance binding activity, replacing subjective intuition with data-driven decision-making and accelerating the development process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If full conformational sampling is performed for peptide molecules, then accurate binding free energy can be obtained, but calculation time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding free energy precisionVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts and isolates the essential conformational degrees of freedom that contribute most significantly to binding free energy, which are the side chain rotamer angles. By taking out only these critical parameters for optimization while fixing the main chain, the calculation achieves sufficient precision without requiring exhaustive sampling of all conformational spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the rapid identification of modification sites in peptide molecules, enhancing the stabilization of complex structures and improving the efficiency of drug development by focusing on side chains contributing to structural stabilization.

Implementation Method 1

a ground state search using an annealing method for an Ising model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Data Source

PatentEP3813069B1Method, apparatus, and program for searching for modification site of peptide molecule
Publication Date: 2024.02.07 FUJITSU LTD
  • EP3813069B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3813069B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3813069B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for searching for a modification site of a peptide molecule includes: calculating, by a computer, a second steric structure of the peptide molecule by using data of a first steric structure of the peptide molecule, the first steric structure being a steric structure of the peptide molecule in a complex structure of a target molecule and the peptide molecule, the second steric structure being a stable steric structure of the peptide molecule in a state where a steric configuration of a main chain of the peptide molecule in the first steric structure is fixe; and comparing data of the second steric structure with the data of the first steric structure in order to search for a side chain having a difference in steric configuration between the two steric structures.