Peracetate Oxidant Solution for Fermentation Bacterial Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling microbial contamination in fermentation processes, such as those used in bioethanol production, face challenges with the use of antibiotics leading to resistant populations and toxic byproducts, while oxidizing biocides can be corrosive and inhibit yeast activity, and non-oxidizing biocides are slow-acting and costly.

Innovation Solution

The use of a peracetate oxidant solution that generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) to rapidly reduce bacterial populations without impacting yeast, with a pH range of 10 to 12 and a molar ratio of peracetate to hydrogen peroxide greater than 16:1, providing enhanced microbial control and reducing biofilm and corrosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If antibiotics are used to control bacteria in fermentation processes, then bacterial populations are reduced, but resistant populations develop and toxic byproducts are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial control effectivenessVSAvoidresistant populations and toxic byproducts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the oxidizing biocide by controlling pH (maintaining fermentation pH of 4.0-6.5) and oxidant concentration (5-50 ppm) to achieve effective bacterial control without the harmful effects of traditional antibiotics. This parameter optimization allows the system to maintain reliability while eliminating resistant populations and toxic byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of oxidizing biocides (which can inhibit yeast at high concentrations) into a benefit by using controlled, low concentrations combined with pH control. The system transforms what could be a harmful condition into an effective bacterial control method that actually protects yeast by preventing bacterial contamination without inhibiting yeast activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Productivity

If oxidizing biocides are used to control bacteria, then bacterial populations are rapidly reduced, but process equipment corrosion increases and yeast activity may be inhibited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial control speedVSAvoidequipment corrosion and yeast inhibition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by严格控制 pH (4.0-6.5) and oxidant concentration (5-50 ppm) to achieve rapid bacterial control while preventing equipment corrosion and yeast inhibition. The controlled parameters ensure the oxidizing biocide acts quickly on bacteria without reaching concentrations that would harm yeast or corrode equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different chemical environments: the fermentor maintains pH 4.0-6.5 to protect yeast, while the recirculation loop allows pH elevation to 7.0-9.0 for enhanced bacterial control. This spatial differentiation of chemical conditions allows rapid bacterial reduction in the recirculation path without exposing the entire fermentation system to corrosive or yeast-inhibiting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If non-oxidizing biocides are used to control bacteria, then toxicity to yeast is reduced, but bacterial control speed decreases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyeast toxicityVSAvoidbacterial control speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by controlling oxidant concentration at low levels (5-50 ppm) and maintaining specific pH ranges to achieve yeast-compatible bacterial control. This transforms the oxidizing biocide into a gentle treatment that acts rapidly on bacteria without toxic effects on yeast, overcoming the speed limitation of non-oxidizing biocides while maintaining yeast safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively controls microbial loads, reduces oxidation byproducts, and minimizes environmental impact, maintaining yeast activity and efficiency in fermentation processes while avoiding the formation of harmful residues.

Implementation Method 1

The chemistry provides rapid reduction of bacteria populations in a fermentation process, including a grist or mash, without significant impact on the yeast population or activity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

The peracetate oxidant solution may provide enhanced separation of microbes from contaminated water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS11001864B1Bacterial control in fermentation systems
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 CLEAN CHEM INC
  • US11001864B1 patent drawing
  • US11001864B1 patent drawing
  • US11001864B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, methods of controlling microbial contamination in fermenters, feedstocks and water, which is deleterious to fermentation, involving the use of peracetate oxidant solutions designed to generate reactive oxygen species. The methods may include providing a peracetate oxidant solution. The peracetate solution may include peracetate anions and a peracid. In some embodiments, the peracetate solution may include a pH from about pH 10 to about pH 12. In some embodiments, the peracetate solution has a molar ratio of peracetate anions to peracid ranging from about 60:1 to about 6000:1. In some embodiments, the peracetate solution has a molar ratio of peracetate to hydrogen peroxide of greater than about 16:1.