Perception anomaly detection for autonomous driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving perception systems struggle with inconsistent anomaly detection across various scenarios, often relying on disparate approaches that are difficult to diagnose and can lead to incorrect identifications, especially in unpredictable environments, and fail to handle lens, scene, and object anomalies effectively.

Innovation Solution

A unified framework for anomaly detection in autonomous driving systems that categorizes anomalies into lens, scene, and object types, using neural networks to identify and classify these anomalies, enabling precise capture and efficient computational handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a unified framework for anomaly detection is implemented, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified framework segments anomaly detection into three distinct modules: lens anomaly detection, scene anomaly detection, and object anomaly detection. Each module processes specific types of anomalies independently, improving detection precision while managing complexity through functional segmentation. The lens anomaly module detects camera lens issues, the scene anomaly module detects environmental anomalies, and the object anomaly module detects unusual objects in the driving environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework implements a universal anomaly detection system that handles multiple types of anomalies (lens, scene, and object anomalies) through a single integrated architecture. This multi-functional approach improves measurement precision by providing comprehensive anomaly coverage while managing device complexity through a unified processing pipeline that reuses computational resources across different anomaly types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If disparate anomaly detection approaches are used, then adaptability to various scenarios is improved, but reliability and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario adaptabilityVSAvoidanomaly detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The unified framework provides a universal anomaly detection architecture that maintains consistent processing methods across all anomaly types (lens, scene, and object anomalies). This universal approach ensures reliable and consistent anomaly detection across diverse driving scenarios while maintaining adaptability through scenario-specific detection modules that operate within the unified framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results from each anomaly module are integrated and cross-validated. The system uses feedback loops to adjust detection parameters and improve reliability by comparing results across different anomaly types, ensuring consistent and reliable anomaly detection across various driving scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive anomaly detection is implemented, then safety is improved, but computational time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidanomaly detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The framework segments comprehensive anomaly detection into three parallel processing modules (lens anomaly detection, scene anomaly detection, and object anomaly detection). This segmentation enables simultaneous processing of different anomaly types, improving overall detection speed while maintaining comprehensive safety monitoring. Each module operates independently and contributes to the final safety assessment, reducing total computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial anomaly detection by prioritizing critical anomaly types based on driving safety requirements. When resources are limited, the framework focuses computational resources on the most safety-critical anomaly detections while maintaining the capability to detect all anomaly types. This approach ensures adequate safety monitoring within computational time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12494055B2Perception anomaly detection for autonomous driving
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 CREATEAI INC
  • US12494055B2 patent drawing
  • US12494055B2 patent drawing
  • US12494055B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A unified framework for detecting perception anomalies in autonomous driving systems is described. The perception anomaly detection framework takes an input image from a camera in or on a vehicle and identifies anomalies as belonging to one of three categories. Lens anomalies are associated with poor sensor conditions, such as water, dirt, or overexposure. Environment anomalies are associated with unfamiliar changes to an environment. Finally, object anomalies are associated with unknown objects. After perception anomalies are detected, the results are sent downstream to cause a behavior change of the vehicle.