Percussion Detection Using Accelerometer and Magnetometer Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing percussion event detection devices have a significant detection error rate and high complexity, often confusing strong angular acceleration with genuine percussion events.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising at least one axial accelerometer and an additional axial sensor insensitive to translational vibrations, combined with low cut-off filtering and analysis means that compare measurements with thresholds, effectively distinguishing between rapid rotational acceleration and percussion events by centering and comparing vector norms within a sliding window.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If at least one axial accelerometer is used for percussion detection, then the device can detect translational vibrations, but the detection error rate increases and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepercussion detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines accelerometer data with additional axial sensor data (from magnetometers, gyrometers, or photoelectric cells) to detect both translational and rotational movements. This merging of multiple sensor types allows the system to distinguish between genuine percussion events and false positives caused by rapid rotational acceleration, thereby improving detection accuracy while managing complexity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces additional axial sensors as intermediary elements that measure orientation relative to a vector field. These sensors act as mediators between the accelerometer and the final detection decision, providing contextual information about rotational movement that helps filter out false positives and improve the overall detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If additional axial sensors are added to measure orientation, then detection accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferentiation accuracy between rotation and percussionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The additional axial sensors serve multiple functions: they measure orientation relative to a vector field, detect rapid rotational acceleration, and provide data for distinguishing between percussion events and rotational movements. By making these sensors multi-functional, the patent improves detection accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same sensors contribute to multiple detection objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If low cut-off filtering is applied to enhance detection quality, then false positives are reduced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsignal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies low cut-off filtering as a preliminary action before the final detection decision. By filtering the sensor data in advance to remove high-frequency noise and isolate relevant signals, the system prepares clean data for the detection algorithm, reducing false positives and improving reliability. The filtering is performed on a window of data related to the anticipated event, optimizing the balance between processing time and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces detection errors and enhances the accuracy of percussion event detection, allowing for precise differentiation between rapid acceleration and percussion events, even when the axis of acceleration is unknown.

Implementation Method 1

The device comprises at least one axial accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The additional axial sensors may be, for example, magnetometers, gyrometers or photoelectric cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetometer: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 3

The additional axial sensors may be, for example, magnetometers, gyrometers or photoelectric cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyrometer: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 4

low cut-off filtering means provided with at least one input receiving measurements transmitted by the axial sensor or sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltering: Filter (electronic)

Data Source

PatentUS9151777B2Device for detecting a percussion event, and associated mobile system
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 MOVEA
  • US9151777B2 patent drawing
  • US9151777B2 patent drawing
  • US9151777B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The device for detecting percussion events (DISP) comprises at least one axial accelerometer sensor (ACC1, ACC2, ACC3), characterized in that it also comprises at least one additional axial sensor insensitive to the translational vibrations (MAGN1, MAGN2), for measuring an information item representative of the orientation of the device (DISP) relative to a vector field of known direction within a fixed coordinate system not linked to the device (DISP), and low cut-off filtering means (FILTCB) provided with at least one input receiving measurements transmitted by the axial sensor or sensors (ACC1, ACC2, ACC3, MAGN1, MAGN2), means (AN) of analyzing the measurements filtered by said low cut-off filtering means (FILTCB), comprising comparison means (COMP) for comparing data from the analysis means (AN) with one or two thresholds (SP, SN).