Percussive Performance Evaluation via Impact Waveform Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for evaluating percussive performances lack comprehensive analysis, particularly in hit-type classification and detailed evaluation of aspects such as stick timing, ghost notes, accent hits, and unique drumstick techniques, limiting their ability to provide accurate and detailed feedback to percussionists.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that capture and analyze impact waveforms from sensors to identify characteristics, classify hits into specific types, and evaluate them against performance targets, incorporating signal analysis to assess timing, dynamics, and spectral metrics, enabling detailed performance evaluation and feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive signal analysis is implemented to classify hits and evaluate performance, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehit-type classification accuracyVSAvoidsignal analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal analysis system is segmented into distinct functional modules: waveform capture module, characteristic identification module, hit-type classification module, and evaluation module. Each module processes specific aspects of the percussive signal independently, enabling comprehensive analysis while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Intermediate representation structures are introduced between signal capture and final evaluation. The system extracts and stores waveform characteristics (temporal, spectral, dynamic features) as intermediate data, which then serves as input for hit-type classification. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall processing by breaking down the complex transformation from raw signal to performance evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If detailed waveform characteristics are analyzed, then information completeness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance data completenessVSAvoidanalysis processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant waveform characteristics needed for accurate hit-type classification, rather than processing all possible signal features. Key temporal features (attack time, decay rate), spectral features (frequency content, harmonics), and dynamic features (amplitude envelope) are selectively extracted and analyzed, maintaining information completeness for evaluation purposes while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230401975A1Evaluating percussive performances
Publication Date: 2023.12.14 RT SIXTY LTD
  • US20230401975A1 patent drawing
  • US20230401975A1 patent drawing
  • US20230401975A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Measures (for example, methods, systems and computer programs) are provided to evaluate a percussive performance. Percussive performance data captured by one or more sensors is received. The percussive performance data represents one or more impact waveforms of one or more hits on a performance surface. The one or more impact waveforms are analysed. The analysing comprises: (i) identifying one or more characteristics of the one or more impact waveforms; (ii) classifying the one or more hits as one or more percussive hit-types based on the one or more characteristics; and (iii) evaluating the one or more percussive hit-types against performance target data. Performance evaluation data is output based on said evaluating.