Perforated Metal Strike Face with Composite Backing for Ballistic Armor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ballistic armor systems are often too heavy, bulky, and expensive, with limited multi-hit performance, making them ineffective against high-velocity and high-caliber projectiles, and they can be vulnerable to cracking and exposure to environmental elements, which compromises their protective capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight armor system comprising a laminate composite material with a perforated metal or expanded metal strike face plate and a thin composite skin, designed to fracture and absorb projectiles, combined with an air space that can be filled with energy-absorbing foam, providing enhanced protection against a wide range of projectiles and fragments while meeting military standards for weight and size requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional ceramic armor systems are used, then protection against high caliber artillery and projectiles is improved, but weight and bulk increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite armor system consisting of a ceramic strike face (alumina or silica ceramic) bonded to a polymer resin backing layer. This composite structure combines the high strength and hardness of ceramic materials for projectile defeat with the lightweight and energy-absorbing properties of polymer resins, achieving effective protection against high-caliber projectiles while significantly reducing overall weight compared to conventional solid ceramic armor systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the armor materials by using specifically formulated polymer resins with controlled molecular weight, crosslinking density, and curing characteristics. These parameter changes optimize the balance between protection capability and weight, allowing the armor to defeat projectiles while maintaining reduced weight through precise control of material properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If conventional ceramic armor systems are used, then protection against projectiles is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes commercially available, cost-effective polymer resins and ceramic materials that can be procured at reasonable prices. The bonding process and material selection are designed to minimize manufacturing complexity and cost, making the armor system economically viable for practical deployment while maintaining effective protection against high-caliber projectiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes manufacturing parameters including curing temperature, bonding pressure, and material ratios to reduce production costs. By controlling these parameters, the system achieves consistent quality and protection performance while minimizing material waste and processing expenses, making the armor economically manufacturable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If conventional ceramic armor systems are used, then initial protection is provided, but multi-hit performance is limited due to cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial protectionVSAvoidmulti-hit performance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a polymer resin backing layer that acts as a cushioning element behind the ceramic strike face. This backing layer absorbs and distributes the stress and cracking forces generated during projectile impact, preventing crack propagation that would compromise multi-hit performance. The polymer resin effectively cushions subsequent impacts even after the ceramic face has been damaged, maintaining protection capability across multiple hits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite structure of ceramic bonded to polymer resin creates a synergistic system where the ceramic provides initial projectile defeat and the polymer provides crack resistance and energy absorption for subsequent hits. This material combination specifically addresses multi-hit performance by allowing the polymer to accommodate and distribute stresses from multiple impacts without catastrophic failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If conventional ceramic armor systems are used, then protection is provided, but vulnerability to environmental elements increases due to cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprotectionVSAvoidenvironmental exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The polymer resin backing layer serves as a protective barrier that cushions and isolates the ceramic strike face from environmental elements such as moisture, temperature extremes, and physical damage. Even when the ceramic cracks from projectile impact, the polymer backing prevents environmental penetration, maintaining protection capability and preventing degradation from environmental exposure across multiple hits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The armor system effectively defeats high-velocity and high-caliber projectiles, including steel and tungsten carbide, with reduced deformation and destruction, and meets military standards for weight, size, and multi-hit capacity, while being relatively inexpensive and easy to manufacture.

Implementation Method 1

designed to fracture and absorb projectiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy absorption: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

air space that can be filled with energy-absorbing foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

designed to fracture and absorb projectiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 4

perforated metal or expanded metal strike face plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS11421963B2Lightweight enhanced ballistic armor system
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 AMERICAN TECHN COATINGS
  • US11421963B2 patent drawing
  • US11421963B2 patent drawing
  • US11421963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lightweight ballistic armor system comprising at least one metal strike face plate, a laminate composite backing material secured to the at least one metal strike face plate and an optional air space provided between the metal strike face plate and the laminate composite backing material. The metal strike face plate or plates has a predetermined defined thickness and has a plurality of slotted holes set at an angle relative to the vertical orientation or axis of the metal strike face plate, or which are straight. The plurality of slotted holes is sufficiently small to prevent the passage of a projectile or fragment therethrough. The laminate composite backing material comprises at least one material selected from an aramid fiber material, S-glass, E-glass, polypropylene and UHMWPE, and is provided in combination with a polymer-based resin material. The optional air space provided between the metal strike face plate and the composite backing material has a depth in the range between 0-12 inches.