Perforated Package for Deactivating Security Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security devices integrated into consumer products can become inoperable during manufacturing processes, and those not deactivated post-purchase can still activate security systems, causing embarrassment to consumers, while existing solutions lack flexibility for multiple device types and effective privacy protection.

Innovation Solution

A flexible package with perforation lines that enclose a security device, allowing it to be rendered inoperable by breaking, preventing activation of security systems post-purchase, using a series of cuts or perforations that overlap the device's antenna coil without damaging the product.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security devices are integrated into consumer products during manufacturing, then security protection is provided, but the devices may become inoperable during subsequent manufacturing processes or remain active after purchase causing privacy issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity device functionalityVSAvoidprivacy protection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The security device is segmented into multiple functional components (antenna coil, circuit board, housing) that can be independently affected by the breaking mechanism. The perforation lines are strategically positioned to break only specific components while leaving others intact, enabling selective deactivation that maintains privacy protection without completely destroying the device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The package is pre-configured with perforation lines and breaking features that enable easy breaking by the consumer after purchase. This preliminary preparation allows the consumer to quickly deactivate the security device by applying minimal force, resolving the privacy concern without requiring complex tools or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If security devices are made permanent and integrated, then security protection is maintained, but consumers experience embarrassment when devices activate security systems after legitimate purchase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoiddeactivation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The deactivation function is extracted as a separate, simple action distinct from the security protection function. The perforation lines and breaking features enable the consumer to easily remove or damage specific components (such as the antenna coil or circuit board) without affecting the overall device structure, allowing quick deactivation after purchase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device transitions from an active state to an inactive state through physical breaking of critical components. The perforation lines are designed to break the antenna coil or circuit board when force is applied, changing the electrical connectivity parameters and rendering the device inoperable without requiring complex electronic deactivation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing security devices are used without modification, then security functionality is maintained, but they lack flexibility for multiple device types and effective privacy protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice type flexibilityVSAvoidpackage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The package design with perforation lines and breaking features provides a universal solution that can accommodate multiple types of security devices (RFID tags, EAS tags, NFC devices). The same breaking mechanism works across different device types without requiring device-specific deactivation procedures, simplifying the overall system while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures consumer privacy by disabling security devices after purchase, preventing unwanted alarms and maintaining device functionality during manufacturing processes, while accommodating various security device types and materials.

Implementation Method 1

The package is designed so as to be able to break the security device through a series of cuts or perforation with a breaking device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentEP2601114B1Privacy protection packet for holding security devices
Publication Date: 2017.10.11 AVERY DENNISON CORP
  • EP2601114B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2601114B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2601114B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention relates to a flexible packaging arrangement for use with security devices. The flexible packaging may include an packet or sleeve in which a plurality of overlapping perforations or cuts may be used to break or render the security device inoperable after repeated bends or application of force to the flexible package to thereby protect the privacy of the consumer and to prevent inadvertent triggering of an alarm system after a legitimate purchase of the device.