Perforated Plate Catalyst Distribution in Counter-Current Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing catalytic cracking methods for producing light olefins face challenges in achieving uniform catalyst distribution, leading to suboptimal selectivity and increased undesired side reactions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves passing catalyst through perforations of a perforated plate distributor in a counter-current reactor at a superficial velocity of 0.01 m/s to 10 m/s, ensuring uniform distribution and controlled contact time with hydrocarbons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If catalyst is distributed without a perforated plate distributor, then the device structure is simpler, but the catalyst distribution uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst distribution uniformityVSAvoidreactor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A perforated plate distributor is introduced as an intermediary component between the catalyst discharge zone and the reaction zone. The plate with multiple perforations acts as a mediator to redistribute catalyst flow, converting non-uniform catalyst discharge into uniform catalyst distribution across the reaction zone, thereby resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and distribution uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The distributor plate segments the catalyst flow into multiple discrete streams through its perforations. Instead of a single concentrated catalyst discharge, the plate divides the flow into numerous smaller channels, enabling uniform spatial distribution of catalyst across the reaction zone while maintaining relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If catalyst contact time with hydrocarbons is not controlled, then the process is simpler to operate, but the selectivity for desired products deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight olefins yieldVSAvoidcontact time control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The superficial velocity of catalyst entering the perforations is controlled within a specific range (0.01-10 m/s) to optimize the contact time between catalyst and hydrocarbons. By adjusting this velocity parameter, the system achieves improved selectivity for light olefins while maintaining operational simplicity, as the velocity control directly influences reaction outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If catalyst enters perforations at low superficial velocity, then the catalyst distribution is more uniform, but the reaction efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst distribution uniformityVSAvoidreaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The superficial velocity is optimized within a specific range (0.01-10 m/s) that balances two competing requirements: low enough velocity to ensure uniform catalyst distribution through the perforations, but high enough to maintain adequate reaction efficiency. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between distribution uniformity and reaction productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the yield of desired products like light olefins while reducing undesired side reactions by improving catalyst distribution uniformity and contact time control.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon feed stream cracks one or more components of the hydrocarbon feed stream and forms a hydrocarbon product stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS12540282B2Methods for distributing catalyst in counter-current reactors and methods for processing hydrocarbons
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US12540282B2 patent drawing
  • US12540282B2 patent drawing
  • US12540282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for distributing catalyst in a counter-current reactor may include passing the catalyst from a catalyst hopper to a perforated plate distributor; distributing the catalyst into a reaction zone of the counter-current reactor by passing the catalyst from a catalyst discharge zone, through the perforations of the perforated plate distributor, into the reaction zone, wherein the catalyst enters the perforations of the perforated plate distributor at a superficial velocity from 0.01 m/s to 10 m/s, and the superficial velocity is in a substantially downward direction; and passing a hydrocarbon feed stream into the reaction zone, wherein the catalyst moves in a substantially downward direction through the reaction zone, the hydrocarbon feed stream moves in a substantially upward direction through the reaction zone, and wherein contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon feed stream cracks one or more components of the hydrocarbon feed stream and forms a hydrocarbon product stream.