Perforating Gun Interlocking Assembly and Skeletonized Body

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing perforating gun systems face issues such as detonation failure, poor ergonomics during assembly, and high manufacturing costs, primarily due to complex assembly requirements and the need for external fasteners.

Innovation Solution

The perforating gun assembly incorporates a bulkhead, electrical feedthrough, charge tube, end alignment, and detonator housing, featuring interlocking joining features, a skeletonized body for material reduction, and a grounding clip to enhance reliability and ergonomics, while minimizing the need for external fasteners.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If external fasteners are used to assemble the perforating gun components, then the structural integrity is ensured, but the assembly complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the fastening function directly into the perforating gun components by incorporating threaded boreholes and corresponding threaded fasteners within the gun body itself, eliminating the need for separate external fasteners. This merging of functions reduces assembly complexity while maintaining structural integrity through internal reinforcement structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The perforating gun is divided into modular sections (gun body, charge tube, detonator housing, bulkhead) that can be assembled separately using integrated connection features. Each segment contains its own fastening mechanisms, allowing for simplified assembly while maintaining overall structural strength through standardized interface designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional assembly methods are used for the perforating gun, then the manufacturing process is straightforward, but the ergonomics of assembly are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidergonomics of assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary alignment features such as alignment pins, locating surfaces, and pre-threaded boreholes that guide components into proper positioning during assembly. These pre-prepared features eliminate the need for complex alignment procedures and improve ergonomics by reducing assembly difficulty while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements such as alignment fixtures, locating pins, and guided connection features that facilitate the assembly process. These intermediary components act as mediators between the various gun sections, making assembly more ergonomic and easier to perform while not significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If a complete perforating gun string is transported to the wellsite, then the equipment is ready for immediate use, but the risk of accidental detonation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness for useVSAvoidrisk of accidental detonation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The perforating gun string is segmented into modular components (gun body, charge tube with explosive, detonator housing, bulkhead) that can be transported separately in a disassembled state. This segmentation eliminates the risk of accidental detonation during transport while allowing for rapid assembly at the wellsite, maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary safety features such as safety pins, locking mechanisms, and designated assembly locations that must be engaged before the gun becomes operational. These pre-prepared safety measures ensure that the gun cannot be accidentally detonated during transport or storage, while still enabling quick assembly when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If more material is used in the perforating gun construction, then the strength and reliability are improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetonation reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by concentrating material and structural reinforcement only at critical locations such as the bulkhead, charge tube interfaces, and detonator housing areas. This localized approach improves reliability where needed without unnecessarily increasing material usage and manufacturing cost throughout the entire gun structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material construction using combinations of high-strength metals, alloys, and reinforced materials in specific sections of the gun. This allows for optimized material usage that maximizes reliability and detonation performance while controlling manufacturing costs through selective material application rather than uniform high-cost materials throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves the reliability of detonation, enhances the ergonomics of assembly, and reduces manufacturing costs by eliminating the need for external fasteners and optimizing material usage.

Implementation Method 1

detonating a series of explosive shaped charges adjacent to the production zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosive detonation: Explosion

Implementation Method 2

explosive shaped charges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShaped charge: Shaped Charge

Implementation Method 3

grounding clip to enhance reliability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical grounding: Earthing

Data Source

PatentUS12264561B2Perforating gun
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US12264561B2 patent drawing
  • US12264561B2 patent drawing
  • US12264561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In general, in one aspect, embodiments relate to a perforating gun that includes a gun body, a bulkhead assembly for coupling the perforating gun to an uphole perforating gun, where the bulkhead assembly is at least partially disposed in the gun body, and where the bulkhead assembly includes a bulkhead and electrical feedthrough formed in the bulkhead, and a charge tube assembly attached to the bulkhead assembly, where the charge tube is disposed in the gun body, and where the charge tube assembly includes a charge tube, a detonator housing interlocked with the charge tube, an end alignment interlocked with the charge tube, and a detonation cord extending from the detonator housing to the charge tube.