Perforation Reinforcement Element for Slab Punching Shear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing punching shear reinforcement elements for slabs with low shear slenderness fail to effectively increase punching shear strength due to steep shear cracks that only intersect straight double-headed anchors close to the column, limiting the enhancement of punching shear strength.

Innovation Solution

A punching shear reinforcement element with at least three interconnected sections, featuring dimensioned bending angles that ensure the shear crack intersects the element multiple times, providing multiple anchoring areas for enhanced anchoring and increased strength, and a compact design that can be easily adapted and positioned during manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If straight double-headed anchors are used in slabs with low shear slenderness, then the reinforcement structure is simple, but the punching shear strength is insufficient because shear cracks only intersect the anchor close to the column

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching shear strengthVSAvoidreinforcement structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The punching shear reinforcement element is divided into multiple sections (first section, second section, third section) with different orientations. This segmentation allows the reinforcement to intersect shear cracks at multiple locations along the crack path, significantly increasing punching shear strength compared to traditional single-anchor configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement element extends in multiple spatial dimensions with sections oriented at different angles (e.g., 45 degrees, 90 degrees). This multi-dimensional arrangement ensures that shear cracks, which propagate in specific directions, will intersect the reinforcement element multiple times, enhancing the mechanical interlocking and energy dissipation capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If traditional straight anchors are used, then installation is simple, but the anchoring area is limited resulting in poor anchoring performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring performanceVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The anchor is segmented into multiple sections that can be independently positioned at optimal angles relative to expected shear crack paths. This allows each section to contribute to anchoring performance, creating multiple anchoring areas that collectively provide superior reliability while maintaining reasonable installation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the reinforcement element have different local orientations and properties optimized for specific functions. For example, certain sections are oriented at 45 degrees to resist diagonal shear cracks, while others are perpendicular to resist vertical cracks, providing locally optimized anchoring performance throughout the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If lattice girders are used to provide distributed reinforcement, then coverage area is increased, but the reinforcement cannot be easily adapted and positioned during manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to applicationVSAvoidreinforcement configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple reinforcement functions are merged into a single integrated punching shear reinforcement element. The element combines multiple anchor sections, bending sections, and positioning features into one component that can be easily adapted to different applications while providing comprehensive reinforcement coverage, eliminating the need for complex lattice girder assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The punching shear reinforcement element is designed as a universal component that can be adapted to various slab configurations and loading conditions. The element provides multiple functions including shear resistance, crack intersection, anchoring, and positioning capabilities, making it versatile for different applications without requiring complex customized lattice structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3617415B1Perforation reinforcement element and structure comprising a plate with a perforation reinforcement element
Publication Date: 2021.10.20 LEVIAT GMBH
  • EP3617415B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3617415B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3617415B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A punching shear reinforcement element (3, 53) has at least one reinforcing bar (4, 5) which has an anchorage section (13, 14) at each of its ends (11, 12). The reinforcing bar (4, 5) has a first section (6), a second section (7), and a third section (8). Between the first section (6) and the second section (7), the reinforcing bar (4, 5) has a first bending section (9), and between the second section (7) and the third section (8), a second bending section (10). In a first side view, the first section (6) and the second section (7) form a first bending angle (α1) of 30° to 50°. In a first side view, the second section (7) and the third section (8) form a second bending angle (α2) of 30° to 50°. The first section (6) encloses an angle of 0° to 20° with the third section (8) in the first side view.For a structure with a slab (1, 51) and a support (1, 51) connected to the slab (1, 51), it is provided that at least one punching shear reinforcement element (3, 53) is arranged in the slab (1, 51).