Perforator Inner Cutting Head Geometry and Decoupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing perforators for drilling through bone tissue, particularly skulls, face challenges in preventing damage to the dura mater due to incomplete disengagement of the cutting head, leading to injuries in about 1% of trepanations, and are complex, costly, and require high process reliability.

Innovation Solution

A perforator design featuring an inner cutting head with an engaging side wall portion and a narrower further side wall portion, reducing the contact area with bone tissue, which decreases friction, wear, and heat generation, and allows for easier decoupling by providing a widening section and a biasing mechanism, ensuring safer and more efficient drilling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a forward force or pressure is applied to the cutting head to drive it through the skull, then the cutting head can advance through the hard layers of bone tissue, but the cutting head may be driven inwards through the newly created hole and into the cranium, potentially causing damage to the dura mater

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling speedVSAvoiddamage to dura mater
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting head is designed to be selectively engageable and disengageable from the drive shaft during operation. A spring mechanism automatically disengages the cutting head from the drive shaft when the skull is perforated, causing the cutting head to stop rotating immediately. This dynamic engagement/disengagement system allows efficient drilling while preventing the cutting head from being driven into the cranium and damaging the dura mater.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the rotational state parameter of the cutting head from rotating to stopped by automatically disengaging it from the drive shaft upon skull perforation. This parameter change prevents the cutting head from continuing to rotate and potentially damage the dura mater while maintaining efficient drilling performance during the bone penetration phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the cutting head is not permanently coupled to the drive shaft, then rotation of the cutting head stops as soon as the cranium is perforated to prevent damage to the dura mater, but the device becomes more complex with additional coupling mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage to dura materVSAvoidcoupling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring mechanism is positioned and configured to automatically disengage the cutting head from the drive shaft when the skull is perforated, without requiring external control or additional complex mechanisms. The system uses the natural loss of resistance upon skull penetration to trigger the disengagement, allowing the mechanism to serve itself and eliminating the need for permanent coupling or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If sufficient force is applied to overcome the biasing force of the spring for the clutch to disengage, then the skull must be perforated, but this requires high process reliability to ensure safe cooperation of various components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess reliabilityVSAvoidcomponent cooperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling mechanism is segmented into distinct components: a drive shaft with a slot, a clutch pin, and a spring. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function reliably - the slot guides the clutch pin, the spring provides biasing force, and the clutch pin transmits or releases torque. The modular design simplifies the cooperation requirements compared to integrated mechanisms while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reduced contact area and decoupling mechanism significantly lower the risk of dura mater damage, enhance drilling efficiency, and simplify the perforator design, reducing the risk of jamming and improving patient safety while minimizing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The inner cutting head is biased away from the drive shaft with a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

reducing the contact area with bone tissue, which decreases friction, wear, and heat generation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250000524A1Perforator
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 ADEOR MEDICAL
  • US20250000524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A perforator for drilling bone tissue is provided. The perforator comprises a drive shaft with a rotational axis A; an inner cutting head with the same rotational axis A, configured to cut a substantially cylindrical hole; and a coupling mechanism for coupling the drive shaft and the inner cutting head. The inner cutting head comprises an engaging side wall portion having a radius r1, the radius r1 being a maximum radius of the inner cutting head so that radius r1 defines a radius of a hole the inner cutting head is configured to cut, and a further side wall portion having a radius which is smaller than radius r1. An inner cutting head is also provided.