Communications Device Peril Detection via User Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for detecting perilous situations, such as gunfire or explosions, in urban environments are limited in their ability to accurately determine whether a user has encountered a dangerous situation and may trigger false alarms, necessitating improved methods for sound detection and confirmation.

Innovation Solution

A communications device equipped with a continuously active microphone and modules for sound detection, intensity analysis, and query generation to confirm the presence of perilous sounds, allowing users to verify the situation and transmit data to a situational awareness system for remote assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sound detection algorithms are used to identify perilous situations, then detection capability is improved, but false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by sending queries to users when perilous situations are detected and using their responses to confirm or dismiss alerts. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from user confirmations and reduce false alarms while maintaining high detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary sound detection and analysis before triggering a full alert, using preliminary classification to identify potential perilous situations and then verifying them through user feedback before final confirmation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If automated detection systems are deployed, then response speed is improved, but accuracy of situation assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidaccuracy of situation assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines automated real-time sound detection with human feedback loops, where users confirm or deny detected situations. This hybrid approach maintains the speed advantage of automated detection while improving accuracy through human verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The user acts as an intermediary between the automated detection system and the final alert confirmation, providing human judgment to validate automated detections and reduce false positives while maintaining rapid response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If fixed sensor arrays are used for gunfire detection, then positional accuracy is improved, but system complexity and deployment difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositional accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the user's existing communications device with built-in microphone as a self-contained detection unit, eliminating the need for complex fixed sensor arrays while maintaining detection capability through distributed mobile sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The communications device serves multiple functions including sound detection, location tracking, user communication, and alert generation, replacing multiple specialized devices with a single multi-functional platform that reduces overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the accuracy of detecting perilous situations by differentiating between user-generated sounds and external threats, reducing false alarms through user confirmation and remote verification, thereby improving situational awareness and response efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

detecting a sound with the communications device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS7844248B2Detection of whether a user is in peril and situational awareness enhancement
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 OLLNOVA TECH LTD
  • US7844248B2 patent drawing
  • US7844248B2 patent drawing
  • US7844248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining whether a user having a communications device has encountered a perilous situation includes detecting a sound with the communications device and determining whether the sound is indicative of the perilous situation. The method generates a query with the communications device for the user when the sound is determined to be indicative of the perilous situation and waits for a response from the user via the communications device. The response or lack thereof is capable of confirming the perilous situation or a false alarm.