Periodic Beam Failure Indicator Reporting in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in beam failure detection and reporting, leading to unnecessary resource consumption and signaling overhead due to the lack of proactive beam failure anticipation by base stations, which can result in delayed recovery and reduced network performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing periodic beam failure indicator reporting configurations that allow user equipment (UE) to report beam failure indicators based on measurements, enabling base stations to anticipate and prepare for beam failures, thereby reducing unnecessary processing and signaling overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If base stations continuously monitor beam status without periodic reporting configuration, then beam failure detection reliability is improved, but signaling overhead and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam failure detection reliabilityVSAvoidsignaling overhead and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic beam failure indicator reporting where the UE reports beam failure indicators at configured periodic intervals rather than continuously. The base station configures the UE with a periodic reporting configuration that specifies reporting instances, allowing the system to maintain reliable beam failure detection while reducing signaling overhead by eliminating continuous monitoring and reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If base stations implement proactive beam failure anticipation through periodic reporting, then network performance and recovery timeliness are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performance and recovery timelinessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables proactive beam failure anticipation by configuring the UE to periodically report beam failure indicators before actual beam failure occurs. The base station uses these periodic reports to detect deteriorating beam conditions in advance and initiate recovery procedures proactively, improving network performance and recovery timeliness while managing device complexity through standardized configuration mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If UE reports beam failure indicators frequently, then beam failure detection precision is improved, but processing overhead at base station increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam failure detection precisionVSAvoidprocessing overhead at base station
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic reporting where the UE sends beam failure indicators at configured intervals rather than continuously or on every measurement change. This periodic approach maintains adequate detection precision by sampling beam status at regular intervals while significantly reducing the processing overhead at the base station compared to frequent or continuous reporting scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12126490B2Periodic beam failure indicator reporting
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12126490B2 patent drawing
  • US12126490B2 patent drawing
  • US12126490B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may receive, using a beam, a plurality of reference signals associated with a channel for wireless communication. The UE may report, based at least in part on a plurality of measurements associated with the beam, a plurality of beam failure indicators according to a periodic beam failure indicator reporting configuration. Numerous other aspects are described.