Periodic Sequence Detection for Fraudulent Payment Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fraud detection software in financial systems requires constant parameter tuning and human supervision, making it inefficient for quickly and accurately identifying fraudulent activities in large datasets spanning long periods.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method and system that automatically detects periodic sequences of payments by collecting and processing payment data, assigning payments to time phases, grouping them into clusters, and determining periodic sequences without human intervention, enabling quick and accurate detection of deviations from established patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing fraud detection software is used, then fraud detection capability is provided, but constant parameter tuning and human supervision are required, reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidefficiency in handling massive datasets
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs parameter tuning and fraud detection without requiring human supervision. The machine learning model self-adjusts parameters based on the data patterns it discovers, eliminating the need for constant manual intervention while maintaining reliable fraud detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and analyzes historical payment data to establish baseline periodic patterns before fraud detection begins. This preliminary action creates a foundation of learned patterns that enable rapid automated detection without requiring manual parameter setup for each new dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If existing fraud detection software is used, then fraud detection is performed, but close human supervision and manual review are needed, increasing device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously performs fraud detection by automatically comparing new transactions against learned periodic patterns. The machine learning model self-evaluates anomalies and generates fraud indicators without requiring manual review, simplifying system operation while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously learns from detected patterns and adjusts its detection parameters based on feedback from analyzed transactions. This automated feedback loop replaces manual supervision by allowing the system to self-optimize its detection accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If manual parameter tuning is required, then detection accuracy can be adjusted, but constant tuning reduces speed of detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidspeed of detecting fraudulent activities
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive parameter optimization and pattern learning during an initial pre-processing phase. This preliminary action establishes accurate detection parameters in advance, enabling rapid real-time fraud detection without requiring ongoing manual tuning that would slow down the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters automatically based on the characteristics of the data being analyzed. The machine learning model adapts its sensitivity and detection thresholds in real-time based on learned patterns, maintaining high accuracy while enabling fast detection without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20190114640A1Systems and methods for detecting periodic patterns in large datasets
Publication Date: 2019.04.18 FIS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20190114640A1 patent drawing
  • US20190114640A1 patent drawing
  • US20190114640A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to systems, methods, and computer readable media for detecting periodic sequences of events. A computer-implemented method may include collecting processing times and values associated with each of a plurality of events. The method may also include assigning each of the plurality of events to at least one of a plurality of time phases, the plurality of time phases forming a period characteristic of the plurality of events. The method may also include grouping the events in each of the plurality of time phases into one or more clusters, based on the respective values associated with the events. The method may also include determining a periodic sequence of events based on the one or more clusters. The method may further include recording the periodic sequence of events in a database of periodic sequences.