Unified Distribution and Return System for Periodicals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for distributing and returning unsold publishing products require separate infrastructure, leading to high costs and space requirements due to the need for distinct distribution and return machines.

Innovation Solution

A unified system that integrates distribution and return operations using an input module, scale, conveyor belts, sorting units, and programmable control logic, equipped with sensors and pivoting trays to handle both functions efficiently, reducing the need for additional conveyor belts and space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate distribution and return machines are used, then each function can be performed with dedicated equipment, but space requirements and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional dedicationVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines distribution and return operations into a single integrated machine. The system uses a common conveyor belt that handles both incoming publishing products for distribution and returned products for processing. A single sorting mechanism with multiple outputs serves both functions, eliminating the need for separate distribution and return machines while maintaining operational reliability for both processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine is designed with universal components that perform multiple functions. The conveyor belt, sorting mechanism, and control system can operate in both distribution mode (processing outgoing products) and return mode (processing incoming returned products). This multi-functionality allows one machine to replace what would traditionally require two separate dedicated machines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate distribution and return systems are implemented, then operational specificity is maintained, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational specificityVSAvoidproduction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By merging distribution and return functions into a single machine, the patent reduces production costs through economies of scale. The common infrastructure including the conveyor system, sorting mechanism, and control software can be manufactured once and used for both operations, rather than requiring duplicate equipment. This integration directly reduces the overall production cost while maintaining the ability to perform both distribution and return operations with operational specificity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal design allows the same hardware and software system to serve both distribution and return purposes. The control system can be programmed to handle different operational modes, and the physical components are designed to accommodate both functions. This universality eliminates the need to manufacture separate dedicated systems, thereby reducing production costs while preserving operational specificity through software control and configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If multiple conveyor belts are used for distribution, then sorting capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capabilityVSAvoidconveyor belt quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sorting function into multiple outputs from a single conveyor belt rather than using multiple separate conveyor belts. The single conveyor belt delivers products to multiple sorting outputs or destinations, achieving high sorting capability through division of the sorting function rather than duplication of the conveyor infrastructure. This reduces device complexity while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding more conveyor belts (horizontal expansion), the patent achieves enhanced sorting capability by utilizing vertical or spatial arrangement of multiple outputs from a single conveyor belt. The sorting function is extended in a different dimension through multiple destinations or outputs that can be accessed from one conveyor, reducing the number of conveyor components while maintaining high sorting capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3138635B1System for the distribution, automatic packaging and return of publishing products
Publication Date: 2019.11.20 KLOTZNER STEFAN
  • EP3138635B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3138635B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3138635B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This invention relates to the publishing sector and, more specifically, regards the use of a system for the distribution of periodicals and newspapers to process daily returns in such a way as to combine both processes in a single system with cost and space savings.