Peripheral Device Error Isolation and Recovery in Storage Servers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network storage systems face challenges in surviving input/output (I/O) errors, as they often require complete redundancy of core components, which is expensive, and struggle to distinguish between recoverable and non-recoverable errors, leading to unnecessary system failures.

Innovation Solution

The system detects errors in peripheral devices, isolates them to prevent further interrupts, migrates operations to a backup device, and executes error recovery and reinitialization routines to reset the failed device, allowing the storage server to continue operating without complete system transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complete redundancy of storage server components is implemented, then system reliability is improved, but cost increases prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments error handling by isolating peripheral devices at the device level rather than requiring system-wide redundancy. Each peripheral device has its own error recovery mechanism that operates independently, allowing selective redundancy only where needed rather than duplicating entire server components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers from peripheral device failures by isolating the failed device and migrating its operations to a backup device, then reinitializing the failed device. This allows the system to discard the failed peripheral's operations temporarily and recover them later without requiring permanent redundancy of all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Reliability

If complete failover to cluster partner is implemented for all errors, then system reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial failover by migrating only the operations of the failed peripheral device to the backup device rather than failing over the entire storage server. This selective approach reduces the scope of the failover operation and minimizes the time required to restore service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary isolation of the failed peripheral device to contain the error and prevent further interrupts before migrating operations. This preliminary action stabilizes the system state and enables faster, more reliable failover to the backup device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If peripheral device isolation is implemented, then error containment is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror containmentVSAvoiderror handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service error handling where the peripheral device driver provides recovery and reinitialization routines that automatically execute when errors are detected. This automated self-service mechanism contains errors effectively while minimizing the complexity of manual error handling procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of repair

If device reinitialization is attempted for all errors, then ease of repair is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror recovery capabilityVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from error detection to determine whether reinitialization is appropriate. The error handling mechanism provides feedback about the nature of the error, and based on this feedback, decides whether to attempt reinitialization or proceed directly to failover, optimizing both ease of repair and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8510592B1PCI error resilience
Publication Date: 2013.08.13 NETAPP INC
  • US8510592B1 patent drawing
  • US8510592B1 patent drawing
  • US8510592B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Error handling and recovery, implemented in a storage server, detects an error in a peripheral device of the storage server. If the error is recoverable, the system contains the error by isolating the peripheral device to prevent the generation of additional interrupt signals and migrates operations of the peripheral device to a back-up peripheral device. The system initiates error recovery by calling a recovery routine and a reinitialization routine, both provided by a device driver for the peripheral device. After device recovery is complete, the system migrates operations of the back-up peripheral device back to the peripheral device.