Perishable Inventory Markdown Optimization via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current retail strategies for managing perishable inventory focus on operational aspects like markdowns rather than decision-making optimization, leading to inefficiencies in reducing spoilage-based shrinkage, particularly in departments like produce, deli, bakery, prepared foods, seafood, and meat, where margins are thin and spoilage accounts for 3.1% of overall shrinkage.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing machine-learning models to determine optimal markdown levels, unit quantities, and durations for perishable items based on predicted customer behavior and item affinities, integrating exploration and exploitation predictors with item affinity analyzers to provide data-driven recommendations for markdown decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If predefined markdown policies and worker discretion are used to manage perishable inventory, then operational simplicity is maintained, but spoilage-based shrinkage reduction is suboptimal and inflexible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarkdown operation simplicityVSAvoidspoilage-based shrinkage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual worker discretion and predefined markdown policies with an automated machine-learning-based system that analyzes inventory data, customer behavior, and item affinities to dynamically determine optimal markdown strategies, thereby reducing spoilage while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service markdown optimization by automatically processing inventory data and generating markdown recommendations without requiring manual worker intervention, allowing the system to continuously adapt to changing conditions while reducing human labor requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of substance

If machine-learning models are used to optimize markdown decisions, then spoilage reduction and sales maximization are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoilage-based shrinkageVSAvoidmarkdown optimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the markdown optimization problem into distinct machine-learning models: an exploration predictor that identifies customers likely to purchase marked-down items, an exploitation predictor that forecasts sales impact, and an item affinity analyzer that determines item relationships, allowing each component to be developed and optimized independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an item affinity analyzer as an intermediary component that processes raw inventory and sales data to identify relationships between items, serving as a bridge between data collection and markdown decision-making, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of substance

If markdowns are applied to clear perishable inventory, then spoilage is reduced, but overall store sales and profitability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoilage-based shrinkageVSAvoidstore profitability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts markdown parameters (discount level, duration, target items) based on real-time analysis of inventory characteristics, customer behavior patterns, and item affinities, optimizing the balance between spoilage reduction and sales maximization rather than applying fixed markdown rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where the exploitation predictor continuously monitors actual sales outcomes against predicted outcomes, and the exploration predictor refines its customer identification based on observed purchase behaviors, allowing the system to learn and improve its markdown strategies over time to maintain profitability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4439385A1Item markdown optimizer
Publication Date: 2024.10.02 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • EP4439385A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4439385A1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4439385A1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A system and methods for fine-grain predictive guidance for item markdowns are provided. The predictive guidance indicates whether an item should or should not be marked down, a markdown level for any markdown, a total number of units for any markdown, a time duration for any markdown, a store location to place an item associated with the markdown, and a listing of customers who are likely to purchase a marked down item when provided a targeted promotion. The predictive guidance utilizes, as input, the output produced by multiple predictive services and weighs those respective outputs to optimize item markdown sales and overall sales of the store.