Permanent-Magnet Gas Valve Unit for Low-Complexity Burner Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas valve units for gas cooking appliances are complex in design due to the need for multiple electromagnets and electronic control units for actuating on/off valves, which can complicate manufacturing and user interaction.

Innovation Solution

A gas valve unit utilizing permanent magnets that can be manually or electrically actuated to control on/off valves, eliminating the need for electrical components by using a rotatable component with magnetically active bodies to open or close valves, allowing for both mechanical and electrical user interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple electromagnets and electronic control units are used to actuate on/off valves, then reliable gas flow control is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow control reliabilityVSAvoidvalve actuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electromagnets and electronic control units with a purely mechanical actuation system. A rotatable member with cam surfaces mechanically actuates the on/off valves through direct contact, eliminating all electrical components while maintaining reliable gas flow control through multiple valve stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple valve control functions into a single rotatable member. By integrating cam surfaces for multiple valves on one rotating component, the system reduces the number of separate actuators and simplifies the overall control mechanism while maintaining independent control of each valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If electromagnets are used for each on/off valve, then precise valve actuation is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve actuation precisionVSAvoidvalve unit manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electromagnetic actuators with a mechanical cam-based system that provides precise valve actuation through geometric cam profiles. This mechanical approach simplifies manufacturing by eliminating the need to produce and assemble multiple electromagnets and electronic control units, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining actuation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If permanent magnets are moved manually, then electrical components are eliminated, but ease of operation may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical component reductionVSAvoidmanual actuation effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a rotatable member that dynamically changes the position of permanent magnets relative to valve shut-off bodies during rotation. This dynamic movement allows the magnets to engage and disengage valves in sequence, providing a smooth and efficient manual actuation process that reduces operational effort compared to static magnet arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a rotatable member as an intermediary between the user's manual input and the permanent magnets. This intermediary component translates rotational motion into precise linear displacement of the magnets, making manual operation easier and more controlled while eliminating the need for direct manual manipulation of the magnets themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple on/off valves are used for gas flow control, then gas flow precision is improved, but frictional losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow control precisionVSAvoidfrictional losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electromagnetic actuation with a mechanical cam system that directly opens and closes valve shut-off bodies. This mechanical approach minimizes frictional losses by using direct contact actuation without the additional friction from electromagnetic coil resistance and electrical contact wear, while still achieving precise gas flow control through multiple valve stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Simplifies the design and operation of gas valve units by enabling manual or electrical actuation without electrical components, providing reproducible gas flow control with haptic feedback and reduced frictional losses, suitable for various gas types including liquid gas.

Implementation Method 1

The open-close valves can be controlled with the help of permanent magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

whose magnetic attraction then acts depending on the position of the respective magnetically active body between the magnetically active body and the respective permanent magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerromagnetic attraction: Ferromagnetism

Data Source

PatentEP2601446B1Gas valve unit
Publication Date: 2016.02.10 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP2601446B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2601446B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2601446B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a gas valve unit for regulating a gas volume flow supplied to a gas burner of a gas appliance, especially a gas cooking appliance. The gas valve unit has at least two two-position valves that can be actuated by moving two magnetically active bodies, especially permanent magnets, in relation to the two-position valves.