Permeable Paver Joint with Segmented Aggregate Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Paver structural systems face challenges in combining compression strength and permeability, especially when subjected to environmental wear and tear, as traditional cement-based joints are prone to clogging and staining, and require large aggregate sizes that do not flow well into small spaces.

Innovation Solution

A paver structural system with a permeable joint comprising a base layer of large aggregates bonded with a non-cement binder and a membrane layer of smaller aggregates also bonded with a non-cement binder, where the membrane layer is less permeable and serves as a filter, providing a strong and drainage-friendly solution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cement-based joint material is used, then compression strength is improved, but permeability deteriorates and clogging occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression strengthVSAvoidpermeability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The joint material is segmented into two distinct layers: a base layer with larger aggregate (#4 to #20 ASTM) for structural strength and compression resistance, and a membrane layer with smaller aggregate (#20 to #50 ASTM) for filtration and surface permeability. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The joint material uses a composite structure combining two different aggregate sizes bonded with a non-cement binder. The base layer provides structural integrity while the membrane layer provides filtration and maintains permeability, creating a composite material system that achieves both strength and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If large aggregate sizes are used in permeable mixtures, then permeability is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to poor flow into small spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepermeabilityVSAvoidflowability into joints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The aggregate is segmented into two size ranges applied in sequence: larger aggregate (#4 to #20 ASTM) in the base layer for permeability, and smaller aggregate (#20 to #50 ASTM) in the membrane layer for flowability and filtration. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by applying each aggregate type where it is most effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution adds a vertical dimension with two distinct layers instead of using a single uniform mixture. The base layer handles the permeability function with larger aggregate, while the membrane layer handles the flowability and filtration function with smaller aggregate, resolving the contradiction through dimensional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If cement binder is used, then compression strength is improved, but object-generated harmful factors worsen due to staining and clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression strengthVSAvoidstaining and clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cement binder is extracted and replaced with a non-cement binder that does not produce staining or clogging harmful factors. This extraction eliminates the source of the harmful effects while maintaining the necessary binding function through the non-cement binder material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-cement binder creates a porous structure in both layers that prevents clogging while maintaining strength. The porous nature of the non-cement binder system allows fluid passage and reduces the accumulation of debris that would cause staining and clogging issues associated with cement-based materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Device complexity

If single-layer joint material is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to filter debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint structureVSAvoiddebris filtration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The joint material is segmented into two functional layers: the base layer provides structural support and initial filtration, while the membrane layer provides refined filtration of debris. This segmentation enables effective debris filtration while maintaining a relatively simple two-layer structure that is easy to install and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each layer is assigned a specific quality function: the base layer has larger aggregate for structural strength and coarse filtration, while the membrane layer has smaller aggregate for fine filtration and surface protection. This local quality assignment achieves reliable debris filtration through specialized zones without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves enhanced compression strength and permeability, allowing for efficient fluid drainage and resistance to clogging, with permeability rates 25% to 400% greater than traditional systems, and effective debris filtration, maintaining system functionality even under wear and tear.

Implementation Method 1

a base layer formed of aggregate and bonded together with a non-cement binder, and a membrane layer formed of aggregate that is sized smaller than the aggregate of the base layer, where the aggregate of the membrane is also bonded together with a non-cement binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

the membrane layer is less permeable than the base layer, allowing for the drainage of fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeability: Permeation

Data Source

PatentUS10626561B2Permeable joint for paver and structural system therefor
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 RICCOBENE DESIGNS LLC
  • US10626561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural system that includes at least two pavers partially defining a paved surface, the pavers partially defining a void between them. The system also includes a permeable joint located in the void between the pavers, where the permeable joint also partially defines the paved surface. The permeable joint includes a base layer formed of aggregate and bonded together with a non-cement binder, and a membrane layer formed of aggregate that is sized smaller than the aggregate of the base layer, where the aggregate of the membrane is also bonded together with a non-cement binder. The membrane is less permeable than the base layer and is located above the base layer.