A-site Ordered Perovskite Oxide Catalyst for Oxygen Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions, such as noble metal oxide catalysts like RuO2 and IrO2, are expensive and lack stability and efficiency, while existing perovskite oxide catalysts have insufficient activity and stability for repeated use in oxygen evolution reactions.

Innovation Solution

Development of an A-site ordered perovskite oxide catalyst with a specific chemical structure, such as CaCu3Fe4O12, that forms covalent bonds, increasing active sites and stability, and using a high-pressure synthetic process to enhance catalytic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If perovskite oxide catalysts are used to reduce cost, then cost effectiveness is improved, but catalytic activity and stability are insufficient compared to noble metal oxide catalysts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidcatalytic activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by incorporating multiple transition metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) in specific ratios, and adjusts the A-site cation composition (La, Sr, Ca) to optimize both catalytic activity and stability. This compositional parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between activity and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite perovskite oxide catalyst combining multiple metal elements (e.g., La-Sr-Ca-Mn-Fe-Co-Ni-Cu system) to achieve synergistic effects. The composite structure provides both high catalytic activity for OER and enhanced stability, overcoming the limitations of single-metal catalysts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If noble metal oxide catalysts like RuO2 and IrO2 are used, then catalytic activity is high, but cost effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcost effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive noble metal oxide catalysts with cheaper perovskite oxide catalysts made from abundant transition metals. While individual perovskite catalysts may have shorter lifespan than noble metals, the combination of enhanced stability through composite design and lower material cost achieves superior cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If existing perovskite oxide catalysts are used, then cost effectiveness is improved, but stability over repeated use is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost effectivenessVSAvoidcatalyst lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs composite perovskite oxides with multiple transition metals that provide synergistic stabilization effects. The complex multi-metal structure resists degradation during repeated electrochemical cycles, extending catalyst lifespan while maintaining cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the local chemical environment around active sites by strategically placing different metal elements in specific positions within the perovskite structure. This local optimization enhances both activity and durability without compromising overall cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The A-site ordered perovskite oxide catalyst exhibits higher catalytic activity and stability compared to noble metal oxide catalysts, with a longer lifespan and improved cost-effectiveness for oxygen evolution reactions in metal-air batteries and direct water decomposition.

Implementation Method 1

a specific chemical structure, such as CaCu3Fe4O12, that forms covalent bonds, increasing active sites and stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCovalent bonding: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The A-site ordered perovskite oxide catalyst exhibits higher catalytic activity and stability compared to noble metal oxide catalysts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10167562B2Perovskite oxide catalyst for oxygen evolution reactions
Publication Date: 2019.01.01 FUJI DIE
  • US10167562B2 patent drawing
  • US10167562B2 patent drawing
  • US10167562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalyst for an oxygen evolution reaction has a higher and longer-life catalytic activity than that of the conventional and expensive noble metal oxide catalysts, such as RuO2 and IrO2. An A-site ordered perovskite oxide catalyst (such as CaCu3Fe4O12 and CaMn3Mn4O12 etc.) as an oxygen evolution reaction catalyst is excellent in cost effectiveness. The catalyst has a high catalytic activity compared with a noble metal oxide catalyst, and a long repetition use life since it is extremely stable also under the oxidative reaction conditions. Use of the catalyst is expected to the important energy conversion reactions such as a charge reaction of a metal-air battery, an anode oxygen evolution reaction in the case of a direct water decomposition reaction by sunlight, etc.