Perpendicular Actuator Fire Control for Accidental Discharge Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional guns lack effective safety mechanisms that prevent accidental discharges and unauthorized use, with existing inhibitor-based systems draining power and being susceptible to tampering.

Innovation Solution

A fire control mechanism incorporating an actuator that obstructs and releases a firing component perpendicularly to the bore axis, activated electronically, pneumatically, or thermally, decoupling the trigger from the sear for enhanced safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional inhibitor-based safety mechanisms are used, then gun safety is improved, but power consumption increases and susceptibility to tampering worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegun safetyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical inhibitor-based safety system with an actuator-based system that uses electromagnetic, piezoelectric, or other non-mechanical actuation mechanisms. This substitution eliminates the need for continuous mechanical engagement while maintaining safety functionality, thereby reducing power consumption and improving resistance to tampering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an actuator as an intermediary component between the trigger mechanism and the firing component. This actuator serves as a controlled mediator that can be activated electronically or through other non-mechanical means to release the firing component, providing a safer and more controllable safety mechanism compared to direct mechanical inhibitors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If conventional inhibitor-based safety mechanisms are used, then gun safety is improved, but susceptibility to tampering worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegun safetyVSAvoidtampering vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing mechanical inhibitors with actuators that respond to electronic signals, biometric data, or other non-mechanical stimuli, the system becomes resistant to traditional mechanical tampering methods. The actuator-based safety mechanism requires specific activation conditions that are difficult to replicate or bypass through physical manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator-based system incorporates self-verification capabilities through integration with biometric sensors, electronic identification systems, or other self-checking mechanisms. This allows the safety system to automatically verify user identity and authorization without requiring manual intervention or being susceptible to external tampering attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the trigger is mechanically coupled to the sear, then ease of operation is improved, but safety worsens due to accidental discharges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrigger operationVSAvoidaccidental discharge prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an actuator as an intermediary component between the trigger and the sear/firing component. When the trigger is pulled, it activates the actuator through a controlled mechanism rather than directly releasing the firing component. This intermediary step prevents accidental discharges caused by mechanical shock or unintended trigger movement, while still allowing intentional firing when the actuator is properly activated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the trigger mechanism into distinct functional components: the trigger itself, the actuator, and the firing component release mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, with the actuator serving as a controlled bridge between trigger activation and firing component release, thereby enhancing safety while maintaining operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12372319B1Fire control mechanism
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 BIOFIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12372319B1 patent drawing
  • US12372319B1 patent drawing
  • US12372319B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides systems and techniques for a fire control mechanism that is implementable in a gun. The fire control mechanism is operable to cause projectiles to be fired by the gun. The gun may include a trigger, a barrel defining a bore axis, a firing component, and an actuator configured to i) obstruct the firing component while in a default position and ii) be displaced in a direction that is substantially perpendicular to the bore axis in response to movement of the trigger, where displacement in the direction that is substantially perpendicular to the bore axis causes the firing component to be released and results in the gun firing a projectile. The gun may include an energy store located below the barrel when the gun is in an upright position, and the actuator may be displaced based on the energy store.