Personal Entry Ranking Structure for Low-Latency Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated assistants often consume excessive processor resources and cause latency when responding to vague user requests for personal entries, such as reminders, due to the need to actively process and sort all entries, which can result in pertinent reminders being presented late or inefficiently.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a data structure that ranks and partitions personal entries into containers based on criteria like creation time, location, and priority, allowing for efficient selection and rendering of a subgroup of entries without reprocessing, thus reducing latency and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all personal entries are actively processed and sorted according to a single criterion, then complete coverage of all entries is achieved, but processor resource consumption increases and latency occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of entry retrievalVSAvoidresponse latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments personal entries into multiple containers based on different criteria (e.g., time-based containers for different time periods, priority-based containers). This segmentation allows the system to retrieve only relevant containers for a given query instead of processing all entries, thereby reducing latency while maintaining completeness of relevant results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary organization of personal entries into ranked containers and subgroups before retrieval operations. Entries are pre-sorted within containers and containers are pre-ranked, so that when a query is made, the system can directly access relevant subgroups without performing comprehensive sorting at query time, thus reducing response latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If all personal entries are processed and presented sequentially, then all pertinent entries are eventually presented, but resource usage duration increases especially for interface constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of entry presentationVSAvoidresource usage duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by retrieving and presenting only a subset of personal entries that are most relevant to the user's needs. Instead of presenting all entries sequentially, the system identifies and presents pertinent entries from ranked subgroups first, reducing the duration of resource usage while still providing complete coverage of relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If a single criterion is used for sorting reminders, then sorting simplicity is maintained, but pertinent reminders may be presented near the end causing user waiting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting complexityVSAvoidresponse efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds another dimension to the sorting structure by organizing entries into multiple ranked containers based on different criteria (e.g., time, priority, category) rather than using a single sorting criterion. This multi-dimensional organization allows the system to quickly identify and present pertinent entries from relevant containers without requiring complex multi-criteria sorting algorithms, thus maintaining simplicity while improving response efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12596722B2Efficient storage, retrieval, and/or rendering of personal entries
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12596722B2 patent drawing
  • US12596722B2 patent drawing
  • US12596722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generation and/or utilization of particular data structure(s) in more efficiently storing, retrieving, and/or presenting personal entry(s) is described herein. Implementations can utilize the data structure(s) in more efficiently responding to a vague user request that specifies a particular type of personal entry, but lacks any additional features of the personal entry(s) sought. Utilization of the data structure(s) can enable responsive personal entry(s) to be efficiently identified (e.g., processor and/or memory efficiency and/or with reduced latency). For example, some implementations can enable selection of a subgroup of personal entries to provide responsive to the vague request, without necessitating any processing of personal entries, that are not included in the selected subgroup, be performed responsive to the request. As another example, some implementations can additionally or alternatively obviate the need to perform any ranking of the available personal entries of the subgroup on the fly responsive to the request.