Personal LLM Agents Using Structured User Models for Task Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing large language model (LLM) agents lack personalization and a robust framework for evaluating the quality of personalized outputs, leading to suboptimal user experiences and inefficiencies in task execution.

Innovation Solution

A multi-component framework utilizing a structured user model synthesizer, personalized task execution engine, and automated quality assessor to generate and evaluate personalized outputs, leveraging LLMs to understand user preferences and provide quantitative assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If LLM agents use generic task execution methods, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but personalization capability and user satisfaction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the task execution into multiple specialized components: a structured user model synthesizer that creates personalized user representations, a personalized task execution engine that processes queries using these models, and an automated quality assessor that evaluates outputs. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one aspect of personalization while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by generating structured user models before task execution. These user models encapsulate user preferences, attributes, and context in advance, allowing the personalized task execution engine to efficiently retrieve and apply relevant user information during query processing without adding complexity to the core execution flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If LLM agents implement personalized task execution with structured user models, then personalization capability and user satisfaction are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structured user model serves as a universal data structure that can represent any user across different tasks and applications. This multi-functional model captures diverse user attributes (preferences, context, history) in a unified format that can be reused by the personalized task execution engine for various types of queries, reducing the need for task-specific personalization logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The structured user model acts as an intermediary between the user's raw data and the task execution process. It mediates by transforming unstructured user information into a standardized format that the personalized task execution engine can efficiently process, thereby simplifying the interface between data collection and task execution while enabling sophisticated personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If conventional task-completion metrics are used, then evaluation simplicity is improved, but measurement precision of personalization quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidpersonalization quality assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated quality assessor implements a feedback mechanism that evaluates personalized outputs against the structured user model and provides quantitative scores. This feedback loop measures whether the generated content actually aligns with user preferences by comparing it against the stored user profile, enabling precise measurement of personalization quality while maintaining automated evaluation through standardized metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260023979A1Artificial intelligence device for personal large language model agents for complex task execution and method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US20260023979A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023979A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023979A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling an artificial intelligence (AI) deice can include obtaining a user query and user-related information, the user related information includes one or more of user preferences, user history and user personal concepts, generating, by a structured user model synthesizer, a structured user model based on the user-related inputs, generating, by a personalized task execution engine, a personalized result for the user query by integrating the structured user model and external data, and outputting the personalized result. Also, at least one of the structured user model synthesizer and the personalized task execution engine is a large language model based agent.