Personalized Action Recommendation Models Using User Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current predictive models face challenges in efficiently generating personalized action recommendations across diverse domains due to the vast amount of available data, requiring significant resources and time, and struggle to balance model performance and generalizability while identifying relevant features for accurate predictions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes machine learning models, such as cohort matching and regression models, to identify user features, assign users to segments, and rank recommended actions based on expected value, probability, and cost, enabling efficient generation of personalized action recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional predictive modeling methods are used to analyze large data sets, then model accuracy can be improved, but resource consumption and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large data set into multiple smaller partitions and processes them in parallel using distributed computing frameworks. This allows the system to maintain high prediction accuracy while significantly reducing the time and computational resources required by dividing the overall modeling task into manageable chunks that can be executed concurrently across multiple processors or machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data processing, feature selection, and model preprocessing steps before the main predictive modeling execution. By pre-processing data, selecting relevant features in advance, and preparing model templates beforehand, the system reduces the computational burden during actual model generation, thereby improving efficiency without compromising accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If generic predictive models are used to apply to wide variety of data sets, then model generalizability is improved, but model performance on specific domains decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel generalizabilityVSAvoiddomain-specific prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model adaptation where the predictive model automatically adjusts its parameters, features, and structure based on the characteristics of the input data set. This allows the same base model to generalize across different domains while maintaining high accuracy within each specific domain by dynamically tailoring to the data at hand rather than being fixed in a single configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes model parameters, feature sets, and hyperparameters based on the specific domain and data characteristics being analyzed. By automatically adjusting these parameters according to the input data, the model achieves both broad generalizability across different domains and specialized accuracy within each domain, resolving the trade-off between being too generic and too specific.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual feature selection and model building processes are used, then model quality can be improved, but time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel qualityVSAvoidmodel development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feature selection and model building processes that perform tasks traditionally requiring manual expert intervention. The system automatically selects relevant features, determines optimal model types, tunes hyperparameters, and validates results without human input, thereby maintaining high model quality while dramatically reducing the time and expertise required for model development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical processes of feature selection and model building with automated computational algorithms and machine learning techniques. By substituting human expert analysis with automated systems that can process data faster and scale more efficiently, the patent maintains model quality while reducing development time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12597526B2Systems and methods for generating predictive data models using large data sets to provide personalized action recommendations
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 INCLUDED HEALTH INC
  • US12597526B2 patent drawing
  • US12597526B2 patent drawing
  • US12597526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for generating a personalized action recommendation are provided. The method acquires a request for a service that is associated with a user and the user's condition. The method then identifies one or more features of the user based on stored user information. The method next assigns the user to a segment based on the identified one or more features, generates a set of one or more recommended actions for the user based on the segment, and determines an expected value of each of the one or more recommended actions. The method determines a rank of the one or more recommended actions based on the expected value of each of the one or more recommended actions, and outputs a recommended action with a highest expected value for the user in response to the request for the service.