Personalized ADAS Intervention Using Driver Profile and Cognitive State

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ADAS systems lack customization to individual driver preferences and styles, leading to dissatisfaction and reduced reliance due to standardized responses that may not align with each driver's unique driving habits and cognitive states.

Innovation Solution

A personalized ADAS intervention strategy is developed, utilizing driver profiling that includes driving style data, cognitive state estimation, and route/traffic information to adjust actuator controls such as braking, acceleration, and steering, tailored to each driver's preferences and real-time conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pre-defined patterns are used for ADAS responses, then system complexity is reduced and response time is improved, but driver satisfaction deteriorates due to lack of customization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADAS system complexityVSAvoidDriver-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting driver behavior data during normal operation and generating a personalized driver profile before ADAS intervention is needed. This pre-processing of driver characteristics allows the system to quickly retrieve and apply personalized parameters when a situation arises, avoiding complex real-time analysis while maintaining high customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting ADAS intervention thresholds and response characteristics based on the driver's personalized profile. Instead of using fixed pre-defined patterns for all drivers, the system modifies parameters such as intervention sensitivity, response magnitude, and activation thresholds to match individual driver preferences and behaviors, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If standardized ADAS responses are applied to all drivers, then system reliability is improved through consistent behavior, but driver acceptance deteriorates due to mismatch with individual driving styles

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADAS response consistencyVSAvoidDriver acceptance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making ADAS response characteristics adjustable and adaptable rather than fixed. The driver profile continuously evolves based on observed behavior, and intervention parameters dynamically adjust to match the driver's current state and preferences. This dynamic approach maintains reliability through systematic adjustment while improving acceptance through personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring driver responses to ADAS interventions and using this information to refine the driver profile. When a driver accepts or rejects ADAS suggestions, this feedback is incorporated into future intervention strategies, creating a closed-loop system that improves both reliability through learned consistency and acceptance through increasing personalization over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If driver profiling and personalized intervention are implemented, then driver satisfaction is improved, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDriver satisfactionVSAvoidData processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from raw driver behavior data to create the driver profile, rather than processing and storing all possible data parameters. By identifying and extracting key characteristics such as typical reaction times, preferred following distances, and intervention acceptance patterns, the system reduces data processing complexity while maintaining the ability to provide personalized interventions that satisfy drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250108837A1Methods and systems for personalized ADAS intervention
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYST GMBH
  • US20250108837A1 patent drawing
  • US20250108837A1 patent drawing
  • US20250108837A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples are disclosed of systems and methods for developing personalized intervention strategies for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) based on in-cabin sensing data and related driving context information. In one embodiment, a method for a vehicle comprises, generating a driver profile of a driver of the vehicle, the driver profile including driving style data of the driver, the driving style data including at least a braking style; an acceleration style; a steering style; and one or more preferred cruising speeds of the driver; estimating a cognitive state of a driver of a vehicle; and adjusting one or more actuator controls of an ADAS based on the estimated cognitive state of the driver, the driver profile of the driver, and route/traffic info of the vehicle.