Personalized Betting Game System with Real-Time Data Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gaming and lottery terminals lack personalized experiences, leading to player attraction based solely on perceived winning likelihood and entertainment value, failing to differentiate offerings among similar options.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that allows users to create personalized betting games by selecting from categories of events, markets, and potential outcomes, with real-time updates and customizable options, enabling personalized experiences across various channels and devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional gaming terminals use standardized game offerings, then operational simplicity is maintained, but player engagement and differentiation are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame personalizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the betting game configuration into modular components: event selection, market type, outcome options, and personalization parameters. This allows the complex personalized betting system to be built from manageable, independent modules that can be configured through simple user interfaces without requiring users to understand the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures multiple market types (moneyline, spread, totals, parlays) and event categories with standardized data structures and calculation methods. These preliminary configurations enable rapid personalization of betting games without requiring real-time complex calculations, thus maintaining operational simplicity while achieving high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If gaming terminals offer diverse playing options, then player attraction increases, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebetting optionsVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal interface framework that handles multiple market types and betting options through consistent interaction patterns. Whether selecting moneyline, spread, totals, or parlay bets, users interact with the same interface elements and follow similar selection workflows, making diverse betting options accessible without increasing perceived complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically generates personalized betting game configurations based on user selections and preferences, eliminating the need for users to manually configure complex betting parameters. The system self-adjusts odds calculations, payout structures, and game rules based on the selected market type and personalization criteria, maintaining ease of operation while offering diverse options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If real-time updates are implemented for personalized data structures, then game accuracy improves, but processing time and system resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidupdate processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous real-time updates of personalized data structures through event-driven architecture, where data changes are propagated immediately upon occurrence rather than through periodic batches. This ensures maximum data accuracy while minimizing total processing time by only updating affected portions of the data structure rather than performing complete recalculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs selective updates of only the specific data elements that have changed (e.g., updating only the odds for a particular market type rather than recalculating all betting parameters). This partial action approach maintains data accuracy for affected elements while significantly reducing the processing overhead compared to full system recalculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10643434B2Computer-implemented methods and computer systems for enabling personalized game betting and lottery playing
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 INTRALOT
  • US10643434B2 patent drawing
  • US10643434B2 patent drawing
  • US10643434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, the instant invention provides for a computer-implemented method, performed by a specifically programmed computer system, that that includes: displaying choices to be selected to define a personalized betting game; receiving selected choices, identifying: i) an event, ii) a plurality of markets, and iii) a plurality of potential outcomes; establishing a personalized data structure representative of data relationships among the selected choices, hereby resulting in a personalized betting game of a user; automatically updating the at least one first personalized data structure based, at least in part, on real-time changes; receiving an entry payment from the user to play the at least one first personalized betting game; determining an actual outcome of the personalized betting game; and determining a reward to be distributed to the user.