Personalized Capnography Using Patient-Specific Baselines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical monitoring devices, such as capnographs, often trigger unnecessary alarms due to deviations from absolute baselines, leading to alarm fatigue and potential overlooking of true alerts, which can be critical.

Innovation Solution

Implementing personalized capnography that uses patient-specific baselines based on characteristics and background diseases to compute deviations, thereby reducing false alarms and enhancing the reliability of alerts by tailoring alarm settings to individual patient data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If absolute baseline thresholds are used for alarm triggering, then alarm sensitivity is improved, but false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transitioning from a universal absolute baseline threshold to patient-specific personalized baseline thresholds. Each patient receives monitoring parameters and alarm thresholds tailored to their individual characteristics, such as age, weight, and medical history, rather than applying a single standardized threshold to all patients. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high alarm sensitivity for each individual while reducing false alarms that occur when absolute thresholds don't account for patient variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting alarm thresholds based on patient-specific parameters including demographic data, physiological characteristics, and medical history. The system modifies the baseline CO2 values and deviation thresholds from fixed absolute values to variable personalized values, thereby maintaining reliable detection of true abnormalities while adapting to individual patient norms and reducing false positive alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If personalized baseline thresholds are used, then false alarm rate is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm rateVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by collecting and storing patient-specific data (demographics, medical history, physiological parameters) before the actual CO2 monitoring begins. This pre-collection of personalized information allows the system to establish individualized baseline thresholds in advance, simplifying the real-time monitoring process while maintaining low false alarm rates. The complex data processing is performed upfront rather than continuously during monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating personalized baseline profiles for each patient based on their historical data and characteristics. These copied profiles serve as reference templates that can be quickly compared against real-time measurements, reducing the computational complexity during active monitoring while still providing personalized alarm thresholds that minimize false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If frequent alarms are triggered, then detection sensitivity is improved, but clinical workflow disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidclinical workflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing local quality through personalized alarm thresholds adapted to each patient's baseline characteristics. Instead of using uniform absolute thresholds that trigger alarms for normal variations in different patients, the system establishes individualized norms, thereby maintaining high detection sensitivity for true abnormalities while reducing unnecessary alarms that disrupt clinical workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously comparing real-time CO2 measurements against personalized baseline thresholds and adjusting alarm triggering based on patient-specific patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to distinguish between normal physiological variations and true abnormalities, maintaining high detection sensitivity while minimizing false alarms that would disrupt clinical workflow and cause alarm fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10393716B2Personalized capnography
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 ORIDION MEDICAL 1987
  • US10393716B2 patent drawing
  • US10393716B2 patent drawing
  • US10393716B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Control logic, device and method including same configured to receive a measured carbon dioxide (CO2) related parameter of a patient, to obtain a patient specific baseline for said CO2 related parameter, the patient specific baseline determined based on a characteristic of the patient; to compute a deviation of the measured CO2 related parameter from the patient specific baseline; and to trigger an alarm when the deviation crosses a predetermined threshold value.