Personalized Collaboration Homepage for Workload Navigation Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing web-based collaboration environments face challenges in efficiently presenting information to users, requiring sophisticated knowledge and time-consuming navigation, leading to decreased workflow efficiency and user errors.

Innovation Solution

A system providing personalized graphical user interfaces that dynamically update and customize information relevant to a user's workload, including due dates, collaboration frequency, and project details, allowing users to prioritize tasks effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional user interfaces are used to present collaboration environment information, then comprehensive information can be accessed, but users require sophisticated knowledge and time-consuming navigation to understand their workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload informationVSAvoidnavigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting, organizing, and consolidating workload information from multiple records before the user needs it. The personalized graphical interface pre-presents this consolidated information including due dates, assigned tasks, project status, and collaborator activities, eliminating the need for users to navigate through multiple interfaces to gather this information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The personalized graphical interface acts as an intermediary between the collaboration environment's data records and the user. It consolidates information from various records (tasks, projects, timelines, collaborator activities) and presents it in a unified, meaningful view that directly addresses the user's workload, reducing the cognitive load and navigation required to understand their responsibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If traditional user interfaces are used, then all available information can be displayed, but workflow efficiency decreases due to extensive navigation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload overviewVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The personalized graphical interface applies local quality by customizing the information presentation specifically for each user's needs and context. It selectively highlights workload-critical information such as due dates, high-priority tasks, and activities from frequent collaborators, rather than uniformly displaying all available information. This targeted approach allows users to quickly grasp their workload without sifting through irrelevant data, thereby improving workflow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary consolidation of workload information from multiple records and presents it in a unified view before the user needs to make decisions or take actions. This pre-organized information includes prioritized task lists, project status summaries, and collaborator activity updates, enabling users to immediately understand their workload and proceed with their work without time-consuming navigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If comprehensive information is presented through multiple interfaces, then complete data is available, but user errors increase due to complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload dataVSAvoiduser accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The personalized graphical interface merges information from multiple separate records including tasks, projects, timelines, and collaborator activities into a single unified view. This consolidation presents all workload-relevant information in one coherent interface, eliminating the need for users to navigate between multiple interfaces and reducing the probability of errors associated with manual information gathering and interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary consolidation and organization of workload information from various records before presenting it to the user. By pre-assembling this information in a unified, contextually relevant format, the system reduces the cognitive load and potential for user errors that would arise from manually navigating and interpreting分散 information across multiple interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If personalized graphical user interfaces are implemented, then workflow efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow efficiencyVSAvoidinterface system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The personalized graphical interface implements a universal approach by using a standardized template structure that can be applied to all users within the collaboration environment. While the content is customized for each user based on their specific workload, the underlying interface framework, data retrieval mechanisms, and presentation logic remain consistent across users. This multi-functionality allows the system to serve diverse user needs through a single versatile interface design, minimizing the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12602152B2Systems and methods to provide personalized graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 ASANA INC
  • US12602152B2 patent drawing
  • US12602152B2 patent drawing
  • US12602152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods to provide personalized graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment are described herein. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment; manage homepage information defining personalized graphical user interfaces of the collaboration environment; effectuate presentation of the personalized graphical user interfaces on computing platforms associated with the users upon instantiation of the collaboration environment by the users via the computing platforms; and/or perform other operations.