Personalized Content Recommendation with Dual-Layer User Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face challenges in discovering new content due to the vast array of choices available, leading to dissatisfaction and inefficiency in content selection, despite advancements in content access technologies like personal video recorders and electronic programme guides.

Innovation Solution

A content recommendation system that maintains user data in both a first storage resource (e.g., hard disk) and a second storage resource (e.g., RAM) during a recommendation session, generating personalized recommendations using user data and content information, and providing them to user devices in real-time or near real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If users manually search and filter content using search functions or electronic programme guides, then users can access content selection tools, but users spend excessive time and effort seeking suitable new content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to find new contentVSAvoideffort in content selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates content recommendations by analyzing user data and content information without requiring manual user input. The recommendation engine self-services by continuously processing user profiles, viewing history, and content metadata to produce personalized recommendations, eliminating the time and effort users would otherwise spend manually searching and filtering content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions with recommended content are continuously monitored and fed back into the recommendation engine. This feedback mechanism refines user profiles and adjusts recommendations over time, improving the accuracy and relevance of suggestions while reducing the effort users need to invest in content discovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If the system maintains user data in both first storage resource (hard disk) and second storage resource (RAM) simultaneously for multiple users, then recommendation generation speed improves, but system complexity and memory management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation generation speedVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user data storage into two distinct layers: a first storage resource (hard disk) for persistent long-term storage and a second storage resource (RAM) for temporary fast-access storage. This segmentation allows the system to maintain speed benefits of RAM while preserving the reliability and capacity of hard disk storage, managing complexity through clear separation of storage functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-loading user data from the first storage resource into the second storage resource before recommendation generation is needed. This advance preparation ensures that data is readily available in fast memory when recommendations must be generated, improving speed while managing complexity through proactive data management rather than reactive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If content recommendations are provided to guide users to content of interest, then users can more rapidly discover new content, but users may feel they are not exploiting the full range of available content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent discovery efficiencyVSAvoidcontent exploration breadth
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system applies local quality by providing personalized recommendations tailored to each user's specific preferences and viewing history, while simultaneously ensuring comprehensive coverage of the content library. The system adjusts the quality and focus of recommendations locally for each user, balancing personalized efficiency with broad content exploration opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial action by providing a curated subset of recommended content rather than presenting all available content. This selective approach improves discovery efficiency by highlighting the most relevant options while still allowing users to access the full content library when desired, balancing guidance with user autonomy in content exploration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250254392A1Content recommendation system and method
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 THINKANALYTICS
  • US20250254392A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254392A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254392A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method may include providing one or more content item recommendations, by opening a content recommendation session for a selected user, retrieving some user data for the selected user from a first storage resource, obtaining content information concerning content available from content sources, using the user data and the content information to generate a content item recommendation for the user and providing the content item recommendation to the user. The user data for the selected user may be stored at contiguous physical locations at the first storage resource.