Personalized Experience Recommendation With Modular Task Curation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack the ability to efficiently reduce cognitive load for individuals by identifying and recommending personalized experiences, leading to increased stress and decreased enjoyment of activities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives requests for experience recommendations, identifies member preferences from profiles, and automatically queries a resource library to generate recommendations based on available experiences, preferences, and feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides comprehensive experience recommendations with detailed processing of multiple factors, then the quality and personalization of recommendations improves, but the computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of recommendationsVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recommendation system segments the complex task into distinct modules: a scoring subsystem that evaluates experiences based on member preferences and feedback, and a ranking subsystem that orders recommendations. This modular architecture allows each component to specialize in specific processing functions, improving overall system efficiency while maintaining comprehensive personalization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing member profiles to extract preferences and pre-processing experience data to identify key attributes. Feedback from previous interactions is also pre-processed and stored in structured formats. This preliminary preparation reduces the computational burden during real-time recommendation generation, enabling fast personalized responses without sacrificing recommendation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the system processes experience recommendations in real-time with multiple factors, then the relevance and accuracy of recommendations improves, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing computational resources on the most influential factors for each member's preferences rather than uniformly processing all possible experience attributes. The scoring subsystem selectively weights factors based on their relevance to individual members, performing excessive analysis only where needed to achieve accurate personalized recommendations while reducing unnecessary computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by maintaining pre-processed versions of member profiles, experience databases, and feedback data in optimized formats. These copied and structured data representations enable rapid querying and comparison during real-time recommendation generation, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy without proportionally increasing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Extent of automation

If the system automatically generates tasks and monitors performance in real-time, then the level of automation and member benefit improves, but the system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask automation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically generating tasks from experience recommendations and monitoring their performance without requiring manual intervention. The task management subsystem autonomously creates tasks, assigns them to appropriate members, tracks completion status, and updates the system based on performance feedback. This automation reduces operational complexity by eliminating manual task management while maintaining high levels of service delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback loops where task performance data is automatically collected, analyzed, and fed back into the recommendation engine. This feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously improve its recommendations based on actual outcomes while maintaining automation. The feedback-driven approach reduces complexity by using observed performance to automatically adjust future task generation rather than requiring manual system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12346851B2Automated recommendation and curation of tasks for experiences
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 PANASONIC WELL LLC
  • US12346851B2 patent drawing
  • US12346851B2 patent drawing
  • US12346851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating and providing experience recommendations to members of a task facilitation service are provided. A task recommendation system can identify a set of experience recommendations within a geographic region. These experience recommendations are ordered based on a member profile. The ordered experience recommendations are provided such that one or more experience recommendations can be selected for presentation to the member. When the member selects an experience recommendation, tasks corresponding to the experience recommendation are generated and performance of these tasks is monitored. The member profile is updated based on the performance of these tasks, the selected experience recommendation, and feedback corresponding to performance of these tasks.